Evaluating Pollution Reduction and Carbon Mitigation in China’s Zero-Waste Cities

Efficient waste management is instrumental in both reducing waste generation and mitigating CO2 emissions. The Zero-waste City Pilot (ZWCP) policy, a location-oriented waste governance initiative, aims to minimize waste production, enhance waste management efficiency, and improve resource utilization. Therefore, does the ZWCP policy achieve the dual environmental effect of pollution reduction and carbon mitigation? Based on panel data from 158 cities in China from 2011 to 2021, this paper employed a difference-in-differences (DID) model to empirically assess the impact of the ZWCP policy on solid waste and CO2 emissions. The results indicate that: (1) The ZWCP policy effectively reduced both solid waste and CO2 emissions, and the estimation results are robust as shown by robustness testing. (2) The policy achieved pollution reduction and carbon mitigation through two transmission mechanisms: stimulating green technological innovation and strengthening environmental regulation. (3) Heterogeneity analysis revealed that the policy’s effects on pollution reduction and carbon mitigation are more pronounced in central regions, non-resource-based cities, and large cities. (4) The ZWCP policy demonstrated no discernible enterprise exit effect, indicating its success in balancing environmental protection with economic growth, thereby providing a strong rationale for its extension to additional pilot regions. (5) The spatial spillover effect analysis revealed no significant spatial spillover of the ZWCP policy’s dual environmental effects. This may stem from the policy’s urban-centric implementation, uneven resource allocation and weak cross-regional collaboration mechanisms—factors that highlight the necessity for stronger cross-regional governance in waste management strategies. The study’s conclusions carry important policy implications for advancing China’s ecological civilization goals while provide valuable insights for other developing countries seeking to design effective zero-waste strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainability
Published
2025-04-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/su17073215
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Environmental Policies and Emissions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.51
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating Pollution Reduction and Carbon Mitigation in China’s Zero-Waste Cities

X W Chen, Yuanyuan Sun, Zeyang Chai, Xinjie Zhu
3 citations
Sustainability
Environmental Policies and Emissions
1.51
article

Evaluating Pollution Reduction and Carbon Mitigation in China’s Zero-Waste Cities

X W Chen, Yuanyuan Sun, Zeyang Chai, Xinjie Zhu
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Efficient waste management is instrumental in both reducing waste generation and mitigating CO2 emissions. The Zero-waste City Pilot (ZWCP) policy, a location-oriented waste governance initiative, aims to minimize waste production, enhance waste management efficiency, and improve resource utilization. Therefore, does the ZWCP policy achieve the dual environmental effect of pollution reduction and carbon mitigation? Based on panel data from 158 cities in China from 2011 to 2021, this paper employed a difference-in-differences (DID) model to empirically assess the impact of the ZWCP policy on solid waste and CO2 emissions. The results indicate that: (1) The ZWCP policy effectively reduced both solid waste and CO2 emissions, and the estimation results are robust as shown by robustness testing. (2) The policy achieved pollution reduction and carbon mitigation through two transmission mechanisms: stimulating green technological innovation and strengthening environmental regulation. (3) Heterogeneity analysis revealed that the policy’s effects on pollution reduction and carbon mitigation are more pronounced in central regions, non-resource-based cities, and large cities. (4) The ZWCP policy demonstrated no discernible enterprise exit effect, indicating its success in balancing environmental protection with economic growth, thereby providing a strong rationale for its extension to additional pilot regions. (5) The spatial spillover effect analysis revealed no significant spatial spillover of the ZWCP policy’s dual environmental effects. This may stem from the policy’s urban-centric implementation, uneven resource allocation and weak cross-regional collaboration mechanisms—factors that highlight the necessity for stronger cross-regional governance in waste management strategies. The study’s conclusions carry important policy implications for advancing China’s ecological civilization goals while provide valuable insights for other developing countries seeking to design effective zero-waste strategies.

SustainabilityVol. 17(7)
Chongqing Normal University (CN), Chongqing Technology and Business University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Environmental Policies and Emissions
1.51
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.