Blindfolding, Perceptual Dehumanization and Tolerance for State‐Sanctioned Killing: A Theory of Illegitimate Punishment

ABSTRACT The present work integrates cultural practices, perceptual psychology and social cognition to explore the psychological effects of blindfolding in state‐sanctioned punishment. Across four studies, we demonstrate how the use of blindfolds—a seemingly minor aspect of punishment rituals—attenuates configural face processing, a change we argue alters social behaviour. Studies 1 and 2 demonstrate that blindfolds are associated with a tolerance for harsher punishments. Studies 3 and 4 explore the legitimacy of punitive action; findings from these studies suggest that blindfolding rituals hold the largest effect when the punishment would not be seen as legitimate. These results suggest that historically ingrained punitive rituals may subtly exploit psychological biases to shape public attitudes, offering insights into the psychological underpinnings of institutional legitimacy and societal compliance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Social Psychology
Published
2025-04-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.3152
Primary Topic
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Blindfolding, Perceptual Dehumanization and Tolerance for State‐Sanctioned Killing: A Theory of Illegitimate Punishment

Katrina Fincher, Patrick Bergemann
European Journal of Social Psychology
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
article

Blindfolding, Perceptual Dehumanization and Tolerance for State‐Sanctioned Killing: A Theory of Illegitimate Punishment

Katrina Fincher, Patrick Bergemann
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT The present work integrates cultural practices, perceptual psychology and social cognition to explore the psychological effects of blindfolding in state‐sanctioned punishment. Across four studies, we demonstrate how the use of blindfolds—a seemingly minor aspect of punishment rituals—attenuates configural face processing, a change we argue alters social behaviour. Studies 1 and 2 demonstrate that blindfolds are associated with a tolerance for harsher punishments. Studies 3 and 4 explore the legitimacy of punitive action; findings from these studies suggest that blindfolding rituals hold the largest effect when the punishment would not be seen as legitimate. These results suggest that historically ingrained punitive rituals may subtly exploit psychological biases to shape public attitudes, offering insights into the psychological underpinnings of institutional legitimacy and societal compliance.

European Journal of Social PsychologyVol. 55(5)
The New School (US), University of California, Irvine (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.