The Complexity of Procedural Fidelity in Precision Teaching: A Qualitative Analysis

Abstract Precision Teaching (PT) is a system that involves precisely defining and measuring the frequency of behavior to facilitate timely and effective data-based decisions to accelerate behavioral repertoires (Evans et al., Behavior Analysis in Practice, 14 (3), 559–576 2021). When combined with instruction and practice approaches, PT has demonstrated efficacy in accelerating learning in academic skills. However, its use in public schools is minimal. One reason for this may be the limited amount of research exploring teacher-implemented PT and how PT fits within the context of busy classrooms. Procedural fidelity is an important concept to consider when procedures are implemented in complex and uncontrolled environments. The present study employed qualitative methods to explore expert practitioners’ and researchers’ perspectives on procedural fidelity, fidelity errors, and their perceived impact when implementing PT. The data were thematically analyzed and are discussed with regard to three overarching themes and their subthemes: (a) The Complexity of Procedural Fidelity in PT, (b) Maintaining Fidelity without Losing Flexibility, and (c) It’s a System. This study is an initial exploration of expert perspectives on procedural fidelity in PT, which can help inform future quantitative evaluations of the impact of fidelity errors on participant outcomes. Findings suggest that participants believed PT is a flexible system tolerant of some fidelity errors but that no component of the system should be omitted completely. Implications of these findings for research and practice are discussed alongside the strengths and limitations of this study.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Behavior Analysis in Practice
Published
2025-04-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-025-01050-3
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Behavioral and Psychological Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.89

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Complexity of Procedural Fidelity in Precision Teaching: A Qualitative Analysis

Shauna Diffley, Chris Noone, Aoife Mc Tiernan, Richard M. Kubina et al.
2 citations
Behavior Analysis in Practice
Behavioral and Psychological Studies
6.89
article

The Complexity of Procedural Fidelity in Precision Teaching: A Qualitative Analysis

Shauna Diffley, Chris Noone, Aoife Mc Tiernan, Richard M. Kubina, Sinéad Quinlivan
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Precision Teaching (PT) is a system that involves precisely defining and measuring the frequency of behavior to facilitate timely and effective data-based decisions to accelerate behavioral repertoires (Evans et al., Behavior Analysis in Practice, 14 (3), 559–576 2021). When combined with instruction and practice approaches, PT has demonstrated efficacy in accelerating learning in academic skills. However, its use in public schools is minimal. One reason for this may be the limited amount of research exploring teacher-implemented PT and how PT fits within the context of busy classrooms. Procedural fidelity is an important concept to consider when procedures are implemented in complex and uncontrolled environments. The present study employed qualitative methods to explore expert practitioners’ and researchers’ perspectives on procedural fidelity, fidelity errors, and their perceived impact when implementing PT. The data were thematically analyzed and are discussed with regard to three overarching themes and their subthemes: (a) The Complexity of Procedural Fidelity in PT, (b) Maintaining Fidelity without Losing Flexibility, and (c) It’s a System. This study is an initial exploration of expert perspectives on procedural fidelity in PT, which can help inform future quantitative evaluations of the impact of fidelity errors on participant outcomes. Findings suggest that participants believed PT is a flexible system tolerant of some fidelity errors but that no component of the system should be omitted completely. Implications of these findings for research and practice are discussed alongside the strengths and limitations of this study.

Behavior Analysis in Practice
Pennsylvania State University (US), Ollscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway (IE)
Irish Research eLibrary, Irish Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Behavioral and Psychological Studies
6.89
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.