Integrating systematic and targeted scat collection approaches to estimate the abundance of a culturally significant threatened species on Indigenous lands

Abstract Estimating the abundance of threatened species can be extremely difficult. This is particularly true in remote regions, where surveys are often expensive and subject to logistical challenges. Where threatened species occur on Indigenous lands, collaborative work between Indigenous people and ecologists who share an interest in the conservation and management of these species may resolve some of these challenges while also meeting additional local objectives. Here, we show the value of integrating two on‐ground methods for non‐invasive genetic sampling of scat to estimate the abundance of the greater bilby ( Macrotis lagotis ), a species highly significant to Indigenous people of central Australia that is threatened with extinction. We compared two on‐ground methods: (1) systematic surveys, designed to be repeatable, stratified, and standardized, and (2) targeted surveys, which focused on areas where bilby sign was present and involved a more flexible and intuitive search technique undertaken collaboratively with local Indigenous people and informed by their knowledge and skills. We compared different combinations of the two methods and different sampling intensities to explore how they affected modeled estimates of bilby abundance, derived by combining information on individual bilby identities (from DNA extracted from scat) with spatially explicit capture–recapture modeling. We found that combining targeted methods for scat collection with systematic sampling provided the best modeled estimates of bilby abundance and improved modeled estimates for lower overall effort than increasing systematic sampling. This approach also allowed for the inclusion of diverse knowledges and approaches to detecting species (scat) presence. By weaving multiple approaches to find and identify bilby scat, we show how collaborative knowledge‐sharing practices can also deliver multiple benefits to Indigenous and science partners.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Conservation Science and Practice
Published
2025-04-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.70034
Primary Topic
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Integrating systematic and targeted scat collection approaches to estimate the abundance of a culturally significant threatened species on Indigenous lands

Hayley M. Geyle, Kelly M. Dixon, Cathy Robinson, Laura Doolan et al.
Conservation Science and Practice
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
article

Integrating systematic and targeted scat collection approaches to estimate the abundance of a culturally significant threatened species on Indigenous lands

Hayley M. Geyle, Kelly M. Dixon, Cathy Robinson, Laura Doolan, Christine Schlesinger, Chris R. Dickman, North Tanami Rangers, Sam C. Banks, Myra Herbert
article en

Abstract

Abstract Estimating the abundance of threatened species can be extremely difficult. This is particularly true in remote regions, where surveys are often expensive and subject to logistical challenges. Where threatened species occur on Indigenous lands, collaborative work between Indigenous people and ecologists who share an interest in the conservation and management of these species may resolve some of these challenges while also meeting additional local objectives. Here, we show the value of integrating two on‐ground methods for non‐invasive genetic sampling of scat to estimate the abundance of the greater bilby ( Macrotis lagotis ), a species highly significant to Indigenous people of central Australia that is threatened with extinction. We compared two on‐ground methods: (1) systematic surveys, designed to be repeatable, stratified, and standardized, and (2) targeted surveys, which focused on areas where bilby sign was present and involved a more flexible and intuitive search technique undertaken collaboratively with local Indigenous people and informed by their knowledge and skills. We compared different combinations of the two methods and different sampling intensities to explore how they affected modeled estimates of bilby abundance, derived by combining information on individual bilby identities (from DNA extracted from scat) with spatially explicit capture–recapture modeling. We found that combining targeted methods for scat collection with systematic sampling provided the best modeled estimates of bilby abundance and improved modeled estimates for lower overall effort than increasing systematic sampling. This approach also allowed for the inclusion of diverse knowledges and approaches to detecting species (scat) presence. By weaving multiple approaches to find and identify bilby scat, we show how collaborative knowledge‐sharing practices can also deliver multiple benefits to Indigenous and science partners.

Conservation Science and PracticeVol. 7(5)
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU), The University of Sydney (AU), Central Land Council (AU), Charles Darwin University (AU)
Holsworth Wildlife Research Endowment, Ecological Society of America, Australian Government, Equity Trustees, Charles Darwin University, Ecological Society of Australia
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.