Evaluating environmental impacts of pork production: A life cycle assessment of seven case studies in Germany

This study presents a cradle-to-gate life cycle assessment (LCA) of pork production in Germany, focusing on pig farming, slaughtering, and processing. The objective is to identify key stages in the production process that contribute most to environmental burdens and explore strategies for mitigation. Seven case studies are analysed, with primary data collected, and evaluated using the functional unit of 1 kg of product. The case studies include four pig farms: one breeding and rearing farm (BRE), one rearing and fattening farm (FAT), and two integrated farms (PIG 1, PIG 2). These farms cover feed production, manure management, and energy generation via biogas, where applicable. One slaughterhouse (SLA) and two processing facilities (PRO 1, PRO 2) complete the analysis. Environmental impacts are evaluated in three categories: global warming, acidification, and eutrophication. Compared to existing studies, global warming impacts are lower, while acidification and eutrophication impacts vary, with PIG 2 showing higher levels. The impacts of SLA are comparable or lower than those in the literature. Across all farming stages, feed production is the dominant contributor to environmental impacts, while energy consumption and waste treatment are key factors in slaughtering and processing. Sensitivity analyses examine variations in feed and energy inputs, and scenario analyses explore alternative feed composition, biogas use, and renewable energy integration. Results suggest biogas production reduces global warming and eutrophication impacts but increases acidification. Introducing economic allocation for feed by-products slightly raises overall burdens, and transitioning energy supply to renewable sources at the slaughterhouse improves environmental performance. • LCA of pig farming identifies feed production as the environmental hotspot. • Slaughter and processing stages are dominated by energy consumption and waste treatment. • Environmental impacts per kg product are higher in farming than in later value chain stages. • Converting manure to biogas improves impacts but increases acidification potential. • Scenario analysis shows renewable energy use can significantly improve environmental impact.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Cleaner Production
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.145408
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.87

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating environmental impacts of pork production: A life cycle assessment of seven case studies in Germany

Andreas Rudi, Frank Schultmann, Nina Treml
4 citations
Journal of Cleaner Production
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
6.87
article

Evaluating environmental impacts of pork production: A life cycle assessment of seven case studies in Germany

Andreas Rudi, Frank Schultmann, Nina Treml
article en
4 citations

Abstract

This study presents a cradle-to-gate life cycle assessment (LCA) of pork production in Germany, focusing on pig farming, slaughtering, and processing. The objective is to identify key stages in the production process that contribute most to environmental burdens and explore strategies for mitigation. Seven case studies are analysed, with primary data collected, and evaluated using the functional unit of 1 kg of product. The case studies include four pig farms: one breeding and rearing farm (BRE), one rearing and fattening farm (FAT), and two integrated farms (PIG 1, PIG 2). These farms cover feed production, manure management, and energy generation via biogas, where applicable. One slaughterhouse (SLA) and two processing facilities (PRO 1, PRO 2) complete the analysis. Environmental impacts are evaluated in three categories: global warming, acidification, and eutrophication. Compared to existing studies, global warming impacts are lower, while acidification and eutrophication impacts vary, with PIG 2 showing higher levels. The impacts of SLA are comparable or lower than those in the literature. Across all farming stages, feed production is the dominant contributor to environmental impacts, while energy consumption and waste treatment are key factors in slaughtering and processing. Sensitivity analyses examine variations in feed and energy inputs, and scenario analyses explore alternative feed composition, biogas use, and renewable energy integration. Results suggest biogas production reduces global warming and eutrophication impacts but increases acidification. Introducing economic allocation for feed by-products slightly raises overall burdens, and transitioning energy supply to renewable sources at the slaughterhouse improves environmental performance. • LCA of pig farming identifies feed production as the environmental hotspot. • Slaughter and processing stages are dominated by energy consumption and waste treatment. • Environmental impacts per kg product are higher in farming than in later value chain stages. • Converting manure to biogas improves impacts but increases acidification potential. • Scenario analysis shows renewable energy use can significantly improve environmental impact.

Journal of Cleaner ProductionVol. 503
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (DE)
Bundesministerium für Ernährung und Landwirtschaft, Bundesanstalt für Landwirtschaft und Ernährung
Zero hunger, Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
6.87
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.