Trends of Drain Placement During Revisional Bariatric Surgeries and Its Association with 30-Day Morbidity: An MBSAQIP Analysis of 64,495 Patients

<b>Background:</b> Drains are often placed during bariatric procedures; however, their use in conversional or revisional bariatric surgery (CRBS) has not been thoroughly explored. Our study sought to identify the frequency of drain placement in CRBS, and characterize factors associated with drain placement and their influence on 30-day serious complications. <b>Methods:</b> Patients undergoing CRBS between 2020 and 2022 were included from the MBSAQIP database. Patients were placed into drain placed (DP) versus no drain (ND) cohorts and baseline characteristics and complication rate were compared. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to identify independent predictors of drain placement and complications. <b>Results:</b> of 64,495 included patients, drains were placed in 19.1% in 2020; this was down to 14.4% in 2022. Drain placement was associated with increased risk of multiple complications such as hemorrhage, readmission, surgical site infection, and gastrointestinal bleeding. On multivariate analysis, drain placement was an independent predictor of serious complications (aOR 1.45, <i>p</i> < 0.001), anastomotic leak (aOR 2.25, <i>p</i> < 0.001), organ space infection (aOR 2.12, <i>p</i> < 0.001), and reoperation (aOR 1.37, <i>p</i> < 0.001), as well as excess LOS (aOR 2.06, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Predictors of drain placement include older age, higher BMI, smoking status, history of venous thromboembolism, and procedural factors, such as undergoing non-sleeve revisional surgery or having an intraoperative leak test. <b>Conclusions:</b> Drain placement during CRBS surgical procedures is common and more likely in higher risk patients and anastomotic revisional procedures. Though the reasons for drain placement were not available, these data suggest that surgeons should be judicious in selecting patients for drain placement due to its association with increased LOS and postoperative morbidity in CRBS.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2025-04-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14072456
Primary Topic
Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Trends of Drain Placement During Revisional Bariatric Surgeries and Its Association with 30-Day Morbidity: An MBSAQIP Analysis of 64,495 Patients

Daniel J. Meyer, Daniel W. Birch, Shahzeer Karmali, Valentin Mocanu et al.
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
article

Trends of Drain Placement During Revisional Bariatric Surgeries and Its Association with 30-Day Morbidity: An MBSAQIP Analysis of 64,495 Patients

Daniel J. Meyer, Daniel W. Birch, Shahzeer Karmali, Valentin Mocanu, Noah J. Switzer, Sukhdeep Jatana
article en

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> Drains are often placed during bariatric procedures; however, their use in conversional or revisional bariatric surgery (CRBS) has not been thoroughly explored. Our study sought to identify the frequency of drain placement in CRBS, and characterize factors associated with drain placement and their influence on 30-day serious complications. <b>Methods:</b> Patients undergoing CRBS between 2020 and 2022 were included from the MBSAQIP database. Patients were placed into drain placed (DP) versus no drain (ND) cohorts and baseline characteristics and complication rate were compared. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to identify independent predictors of drain placement and complications. <b>Results:</b> of 64,495 included patients, drains were placed in 19.1% in 2020; this was down to 14.4% in 2022. Drain placement was associated with increased risk of multiple complications such as hemorrhage, readmission, surgical site infection, and gastrointestinal bleeding. On multivariate analysis, drain placement was an independent predictor of serious complications (aOR 1.45, <i>p</i> < 0.001), anastomotic leak (aOR 2.25, <i>p</i> < 0.001), organ space infection (aOR 2.12, <i>p</i> < 0.001), and reoperation (aOR 1.37, <i>p</i> < 0.001), as well as excess LOS (aOR 2.06, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Predictors of drain placement include older age, higher BMI, smoking status, history of venous thromboembolism, and procedural factors, such as undergoing non-sleeve revisional surgery or having an intraoperative leak test. <b>Conclusions:</b> Drain placement during CRBS surgical procedures is common and more likely in higher risk patients and anastomotic revisional procedures. Though the reasons for drain placement were not available, these data suggest that surgeons should be judicious in selecting patients for drain placement due to its association with increased LOS and postoperative morbidity in CRBS.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 14(7)
Cleveland Clinic (US), University of Alberta (CA), Royal Alexandra Hospital (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.