Comparative performance evaluation of bisulfite- and enzyme-based DNA conversion methods
Our findings indicate that both DNA conversion methods have strengths and weaknesses. BC shows a high recovery, whereas EC does not cause extensive fragmentation that is characteristic to BC. EC is, therefore, more robust to the analysis of degraded DNA such as forensic-type or cell-free DNA, at least for the genomic DNA inputs tested here. We believe that the low recovery of EC could be improved by further optimizing and automating the bead-based cleanup steps. Overall, our study provides the first independent benchmarking of bisulfite- and enzyme-based conversion kits.
Authors
- Hieab H.H. Adams (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3687-2508)
- Athina Vidaki (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5470-245X)
- Faidra Karkala
- Manfred Kayser (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4958-847X)
- Roy B. Simons (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0001-4927-2440)
- Marta M Kukk
Institutions
- Erasmus MC (NL)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Clinical Epigenetics
- Published
- 2025-04-03
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s13148-025-01855-7
- Citations
- 10
- Primary Topic
- Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 8.06
Funders
- Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek