Comparative performance evaluation of bisulfite- and enzyme-based DNA conversion methods

Our findings indicate that both DNA conversion methods have strengths and weaknesses. BC shows a high recovery, whereas EC does not cause extensive fragmentation that is characteristic to BC. EC is, therefore, more robust to the analysis of degraded DNA such as forensic-type or cell-free DNA, at least for the genomic DNA inputs tested here. We believe that the low recovery of EC could be improved by further optimizing and automating the bead-based cleanup steps. Overall, our study provides the first independent benchmarking of bisulfite- and enzyme-based conversion kits.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Epigenetics
Published
2025-04-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13148-025-01855-7
Citations
10
Primary Topic
Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.06

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative performance evaluation of bisulfite- and enzyme-based DNA conversion methods

Hieab H.H. Adams, Athina Vidaki, Faidra Karkala, Manfred Kayser et al.
10 citations
Clinical Epigenetics
Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
8.06
article

Comparative performance evaluation of bisulfite- and enzyme-based DNA conversion methods

Hieab H.H. Adams, Athina Vidaki, Faidra Karkala, Manfred Kayser, Roy B. Simons, Marta M Kukk
article en
10 citations

Abstract

Our findings indicate that both DNA conversion methods have strengths and weaknesses. BC shows a high recovery, whereas EC does not cause extensive fragmentation that is characteristic to BC. EC is, therefore, more robust to the analysis of degraded DNA such as forensic-type or cell-free DNA, at least for the genomic DNA inputs tested here. We believe that the low recovery of EC could be improved by further optimizing and automating the bead-based cleanup steps. Overall, our study provides the first independent benchmarking of bisulfite- and enzyme-based conversion kits.

Clinical EpigeneticsVol. 17(1)
Erasmus MC (NL)
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
8.06
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparative performance evaluation of bisulfite- and enzyme-based DNA conversion methods — Hieab H.H. Adams, Athina Vidaki, et al. · Clinical Epigenetics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS