Forecasting Carbon Prices: What Is the Role of Technology?

ABSTRACT We examine the role of the technology in predicting carbon prices using a large set of machine learning models. The predictors are selected from technological, environmental, financial, energy, and geopolitical aspects. Our sample covers the daily period from August 1, 2014, to March 4, 2024. We find that technology factors (Information Technology Index, AEX Technology Index, and Tech All Share Index) significantly improve the prediction accuracy of carbon prices, both when included in the prediction model individually and simultaneously. Furthermore, the Diebold–Mariano and Clark–West tests highly reject the null of equal predictive accuracy between the technology model and the baseline model (without technology variables). Moreover, results show that XGBoost outperforms the alternative machine learning models for all forecasting horizons (1, 5, 22, and 250 days). We present significant policy implications useful for investors, companies, and policymakers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Forecasting
Published
2025-04-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/for.3275
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.09
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Forecasting Carbon Prices: What Is the Role of Technology?

Ali Ben Mrad, Amine Lahiani, Salma Mefteh‐Wali, Nada Mselmi
3 citations
Journal of Forecasting
Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies
1.09
article

Forecasting Carbon Prices: What Is the Role of Technology?

Ali Ben Mrad, Amine Lahiani, Salma Mefteh‐Wali, Nada Mselmi
article en
3 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT We examine the role of the technology in predicting carbon prices using a large set of machine learning models. The predictors are selected from technological, environmental, financial, energy, and geopolitical aspects. Our sample covers the daily period from August 1, 2014, to March 4, 2024. We find that technology factors (Information Technology Index, AEX Technology Index, and Tech All Share Index) significantly improve the prediction accuracy of carbon prices, both when included in the prediction model individually and simultaneously. Furthermore, the Diebold–Mariano and Clark–West tests highly reject the null of equal predictive accuracy between the technology model and the baseline model (without technology variables). Moreover, results show that XGBoost outperforms the alternative machine learning models for all forecasting horizons (1, 5, 22, and 250 days). We present significant policy implications useful for investors, companies, and policymakers.

Journal of ForecastingVol. 44(6)
University of Sfax (TN), Qassim University (SA), Gulf University for Science & Technology (KW), Université Paris-Saclay (FR), Laboratoire d’Économie d’Orléans (FR), ESSCA School of Management (FR)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies
1.09
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Forecasting Carbon Prices: What Is the Role of Technology? — Ali Ben Mrad, Amine Lahiani, et al. · Journal of Forecasting (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS