Investigating Steady-State Interpolation and Transient Hydraulic Modelling to Evaluate European Grayling Habitat in a Hydropeaking River

Renewable energy sources such as hydropower are important to reduce the global emissions. Hydropower, however, comes with other environmental challenges by altering the ecological conditions in the rivers. Hydraulic models connected with fish habitat models could be one tool to assess the environmental impacts and evaluate mitigation measures for fish habitats. This study examines the limitations of steady-state hydraulic simulations in a low-sloping river located between two hydropower plants, where downstream regulations significantly influence the river flow dynamics. A 2D hydrodynamic model in Delft3D FM was applied to compare steady-state and transient simulations, focusing on how hydraulic variables affect the spawning habitat. The results show that steady-state models fail to capture time-dependent damping and delayed water level responses, leading to systematic underestimation of hydraulic variability. Peak bed shear stress values were under-predicted by the steady-state interpolation, which may under-predict spawning ground stability. Additionally, the steady-state approach failed to capture daily habitat fluctuations, resulting in a mean absolute error of 2910 m2 in spawning habitat area per hour. This study demonstrates how errors in hydraulic calculations propagate into habitat assessments, potentially leading to misleading long-term evaluations of fish populations. This study highlights the importance of selecting appropriate hydraulic modelling approaches based on river-specific flow dynamics. Future studies should investigate the sensitivity of fish habitat models to hydraulic inputs from steady-state and transient simulations by integrating these approaches into advanced fish modelling tools, such as individual-based models. This will help determine the optimal balance between computational efficiency and accuracy in long-term habitat assessments.