History, structure and conjuncture: Imperialism and the polity in Pakistan

This paper develops Antonio Gramsci’s distinction between organic and conjunctural terrains to delineate the relationship between imperialism and the polity in Pakistan. A political-economic analysis of the mechanisms and magnitude of unequal exchange and economic drain over the last three and a half decades is carried out through domestic and international data sources. This imperial-economic mooring is then brought into conversation with Pakistan’s contemporary history. It is through this intersection of structure and history that the specific structuring of the political terrain in Pakistan may be elucidated. A Gramscian understanding of passive revolution, conjunctures and their articulation of organic processes helps understand how imperialism conditions punctual shifts in the polity. Such a Gramscian framework also helps move beyond some of the polarised debates in critical social theory when it comes to understanding imperialism and its internality to peripheral social formations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environment and Planning A Economy and Space
Published
2025-04-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518x251326388
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
25.57
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

History, structure and conjuncture: Imperialism and the polity in Pakistan

Muhammad Tayyab Safdar, Ayyaz Mallick, Bilal Ayaz Butt
3 citations
Environment and Planning A Economy and Space
Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East
25.57
article

History, structure and conjuncture: Imperialism and the polity in Pakistan

Muhammad Tayyab Safdar, Ayyaz Mallick, Bilal Ayaz Butt
article en
3 citations

Abstract

This paper develops Antonio Gramsci’s distinction between organic and conjunctural terrains to delineate the relationship between imperialism and the polity in Pakistan. A political-economic analysis of the mechanisms and magnitude of unequal exchange and economic drain over the last three and a half decades is carried out through domestic and international data sources. This imperial-economic mooring is then brought into conversation with Pakistan’s contemporary history. It is through this intersection of structure and history that the specific structuring of the political terrain in Pakistan may be elucidated. A Gramscian understanding of passive revolution, conjunctures and their articulation of organic processes helps understand how imperialism conditions punctual shifts in the polity. Such a Gramscian framework also helps move beyond some of the polarised debates in critical social theory when it comes to understanding imperialism and its internality to peripheral social formations.

Environment and Planning A Economy and SpaceVol. 57(4)
University of Liverpool (GB), University of Virginia (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East
25.57
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

History, structure and conjuncture: Imperialism and the polity in Pakistan — Muhammad Tayyab Safdar, Ayyaz Mallick, et al. · Environment and Planning A Economy and Space (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS