How to Tell an N from an O: Controlling the Chemoselectivity of Methyltransferases

<i>S</i>-Adenosyl-l-methionine (SAM)-dependent methyltransferases (MTs) are important enzymes in numerous biological pathways. They share a common S <sub><i>N</i></sub> 2 mechanism but act on different nucleophilic substrates in vivo. Therefore, MTs have a specific chemoselectivity to transfer CH<sub>3</sub> onto the correct atom type and substrate. Caffeate <i>O</i>-MT from <i>Prunus persica</i> (<i>Pp</i>CaOMT) and anthranilate <i>N</i>-MT from <i>Ruta graveolens</i> (<i>Rg</i>ANMT) share a high similarity regarding their amino acid sequence (>74%). Nevertheless, the physiological substrates (caffeate vs anthranilate) and attacking nucleophiles (hydroxyl vs amino group) are strikingly different. We demonstrate that the differing chemoselectivity is governed by different conformational states of the two enzymes. <i>O</i>-Methylation catalyzed by CaOMTs requires a "closed" conformation, whereas ANMTs perform <i>N</i>-methylation in an "open" state. We rationally designed seven variants for both <i>Pp</i>CaOMT and <i>Rg</i>ANMT, which changed their original nucleophile preference to different extents, up to a full inversion. Interestingly, the generated <i>O</i>-selective ANMT variant catalyzes <i>O</i>-methylation considerably faster than wildtype CaOMT. Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations and hydrogen/deuterium exchange mass spectrometry (HDX-MS) experiments showed that the mutations induced changes in the conformational dynamics of the enzyme variants and by modulating the open/closed transitions impact the corresponding chemoselectivity. Our data show that the selectivity of the methyl transfer reaction is not solely governed by the key residues directly involved in the methyl transfer but is rather synergistically modulated by the conformational dynamics of the enzyme and reaction conditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACS Catalysis
Published
2025-04-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.5c00834
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.84

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How to Tell an N from an O: Controlling the Chemoselectivity of Methyltransferases

Emely Jockmann, Michael Andreas Müller, Helena Girame, Jennifer N. Andexer et al.
6 citations
ACS Catalysis
Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
4.84
article

How to Tell an N from an O: Controlling the Chemoselectivity of Methyltransferases

Emely Jockmann, Michael Andreas Müller, Helena Girame, Jennifer N. Andexer, Gert Bange, Ferran Feixas, Kai Tittmann, Marc Garcia‐Borràs, Wieland Steinchen, Kalle Kind
article en
6 citations

Abstract

<i>S</i>-Adenosyl-l-methionine (SAM)-dependent methyltransferases (MTs) are important enzymes in numerous biological pathways. They share a common S <sub><i>N</i></sub> 2 mechanism but act on different nucleophilic substrates in vivo. Therefore, MTs have a specific chemoselectivity to transfer CH<sub>3</sub> onto the correct atom type and substrate. Caffeate <i>O</i>-MT from <i>Prunus persica</i> (<i>Pp</i>CaOMT) and anthranilate <i>N</i>-MT from <i>Ruta graveolens</i> (<i>Rg</i>ANMT) share a high similarity regarding their amino acid sequence (>74%). Nevertheless, the physiological substrates (caffeate vs anthranilate) and attacking nucleophiles (hydroxyl vs amino group) are strikingly different. We demonstrate that the differing chemoselectivity is governed by different conformational states of the two enzymes. <i>O</i>-Methylation catalyzed by CaOMTs requires a "closed" conformation, whereas ANMTs perform <i>N</i>-methylation in an "open" state. We rationally designed seven variants for both <i>Pp</i>CaOMT and <i>Rg</i>ANMT, which changed their original nucleophile preference to different extents, up to a full inversion. Interestingly, the generated <i>O</i>-selective ANMT variant catalyzes <i>O</i>-methylation considerably faster than wildtype CaOMT. Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations and hydrogen/deuterium exchange mass spectrometry (HDX-MS) experiments showed that the mutations induced changes in the conformational dynamics of the enzyme variants and by modulating the open/closed transitions impact the corresponding chemoselectivity. Our data show that the selectivity of the methyl transfer reaction is not solely governed by the key residues directly involved in the methyl transfer but is rather synergistically modulated by the conformational dynamics of the enzyme and reaction conditions.

ACS CatalysisVol. 15(8)
University of Freiburg (DE), Philipps University of Marburg (DE), Universitat de Girona (ES), Loewe Center for Synthetic Microbiology (DE), University of Göttingen (DE)
Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Agència de Gestió d'Ajuts Universitaris i de Recerca
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
4.84
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.