Self-Driving Technology and Its Acceptance: Explaining Differences in Reactions of the Heterogeneous Population to Potential Policies

Self-driving vehicles have the potential to drastically reduce accidents caused by human errors, saving significant amounts of money in damages as well as human lives. However, public acceptance of the technology operating on public roads still needs to improve, as most Americans are uncomfortable sharing the road with a self-driving vehicle. The challenge for policymakers is to craft regulations that not only enhance the safety of self-driving technology but also foster public trust and acceptance. This study examines how specific policies—requiring visual cues to indicate when a vehicle is operating in self-driving mode and certification requirements for users—impact public acceptance of self-driving vehicles. To evaluate the impact of the policies, we theorize how policies may influence people's trust and how trust, in turn, may affect acceptance of the technology. Furthermore, we examine how these effects vary across political affiliations, as prior research suggests that Republicans and Democrats differ in their trust in government oversight and technological innovation. Our findings confirm that Republicans are generally less willing to share the road with self-driving vehicles than Democrats, largely due to lower trust in the government to regulate the technology effectively. We find that a visual cue policy increases trust in government but decreases trust in the technology, leading to increased acceptance among Republicans but a neutral or negative effect for Democrats. Conversely, a certification requirement increases trust in government and in other drivers, positively impacting acceptance for both Republicans and Democrats. Finally, additional analysis revealed that a combined policy implementing both measures proves to be the most effective at increasing overall public acceptance by strengthening trust across multiple dimensions. These insights provide valuable guidance for policymakers seeking to improve the integration of self-driving vehicles into public roadways.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Production and Operations Management
Published
2025-04-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10591478251333725
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Innovation Diffusion and Forecasting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.32
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Self-Driving Technology and Its Acceptance: Explaining Differences in Reactions of the Heterogeneous Population to Potential Policies

Promothesh Chatterjee, Rohit Aggarwal, Nicholas Sullivan, Vishal Midha
3 citations
Production and Operations Management
Innovation Diffusion and Forecasting
6.32
article

Self-Driving Technology and Its Acceptance: Explaining Differences in Reactions of the Heterogeneous Population to Potential Policies

Promothesh Chatterjee, Rohit Aggarwal, Nicholas Sullivan, Vishal Midha
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Self-driving vehicles have the potential to drastically reduce accidents caused by human errors, saving significant amounts of money in damages as well as human lives. However, public acceptance of the technology operating on public roads still needs to improve, as most Americans are uncomfortable sharing the road with a self-driving vehicle. The challenge for policymakers is to craft regulations that not only enhance the safety of self-driving technology but also foster public trust and acceptance. This study examines how specific policies—requiring visual cues to indicate when a vehicle is operating in self-driving mode and certification requirements for users—impact public acceptance of self-driving vehicles. To evaluate the impact of the policies, we theorize how policies may influence people's trust and how trust, in turn, may affect acceptance of the technology. Furthermore, we examine how these effects vary across political affiliations, as prior research suggests that Republicans and Democrats differ in their trust in government oversight and technological innovation. Our findings confirm that Republicans are generally less willing to share the road with self-driving vehicles than Democrats, largely due to lower trust in the government to regulate the technology effectively. We find that a visual cue policy increases trust in government but decreases trust in the technology, leading to increased acceptance among Republicans but a neutral or negative effect for Democrats. Conversely, a certification requirement increases trust in government and in other drivers, positively impacting acceptance for both Republicans and Democrats. Finally, additional analysis revealed that a combined policy implementing both measures proves to be the most effective at increasing overall public acceptance by strengthening trust across multiple dimensions. These insights provide valuable guidance for policymakers seeking to improve the integration of self-driving vehicles into public roadways.

Production and Operations ManagementVol. 34(11)
University of Utah (US), University of Mississippi (US), Illinois State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Innovation Diffusion and Forecasting
6.32
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.