The State-reinforced self-governance framework: conceptualizing and diagnosing legal and other institutional foundations of adaptive and transformative environmental governance

Governance of complex social-ecological dilemmas requires institutional innovation, adaptive decision making, and cooperation to address integrative, multi-scale problems. Governments can facilitate such adaptive and transformative governance (ATG) by enabling stakeholder capacity for self-organization and cooperation. However, the complexity of most governance systems makes it difficult to diagnose the ATG capacity of existing systems for institutional design. To address this gap, we introduce the State-reinforced self-governance (SRSG) framework, which builds upon Elinor Ostrom’s foundational frameworks for understanding institutional complexity in social-ecological systems. The SRSG framework introduces design principles, a typology of institutional capacities, and governance network approach to help analysts conceptualize and assess the adaptive/transformative capacity of governance systems. The framework also provides an updated conceptualization of State (government) action, facilitating assessment of de/centralization, co-production, and self-governance. We use case studies drawn from diverse systems and problems to illustrate key principles, including diverse roles and mechanisms governments use to enable or constrain ATG. Finally, we discuss how to analyze institutional evolution in terms of changes in underlying design principles (i.e., capacities), actor types, collectives, and governance network structures. We identify future research opportunities and challenges, and methodological advancements. Our goal is to provide analytical conventions that help scientists, policymakers, and dilemma stakeholders conceptualize and design more resilient and sustainable social-ecological systems.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Ecology and Society
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5751/es-15567-300201
Citations
10
Primary Topic
Environmental law and policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
159.84
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The State-reinforced self-governance framework: conceptualizing and diagnosing legal and other institutional foundations of adaptive and transformative environmental governance

Edella Schlager, Daniel A. DeCaro, Emmanuel Frimpong Boamah
10 citations
Ecology and Society
Environmental law and policy
159.84
article

The State-reinforced self-governance framework: conceptualizing and diagnosing legal and other institutional foundations of adaptive and transformative environmental governance

Edella Schlager, Daniel A. DeCaro, Emmanuel Frimpong Boamah
article en
10 citations

Abstract

Governance of complex social-ecological dilemmas requires institutional innovation, adaptive decision making, and cooperation to address integrative, multi-scale problems. Governments can facilitate such adaptive and transformative governance (ATG) by enabling stakeholder capacity for self-organization and cooperation. However, the complexity of most governance systems makes it difficult to diagnose the ATG capacity of existing systems for institutional design. To address this gap, we introduce the State-reinforced self-governance (SRSG) framework, which builds upon Elinor Ostrom’s foundational frameworks for understanding institutional complexity in social-ecological systems. The SRSG framework introduces design principles, a typology of institutional capacities, and governance network approach to help analysts conceptualize and assess the adaptive/transformative capacity of governance systems. The framework also provides an updated conceptualization of State (government) action, facilitating assessment of de/centralization, co-production, and self-governance. We use case studies drawn from diverse systems and problems to illustrate key principles, including diverse roles and mechanisms governments use to enable or constrain ATG. Finally, we discuss how to analyze institutional evolution in terms of changes in underlying design principles (i.e., capacities), actor types, collectives, and governance network structures. We identify future research opportunities and challenges, and methodological advancements. Our goal is to provide analytical conventions that help scientists, policymakers, and dilemma stakeholders conceptualize and design more resilient and sustainable social-ecological systems.

Ecology and SocietyVol. 30(2)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Environmental law and policy
159.84
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.