Can Social Robots Improve People’s Attitudes toward Individuals Who Stutter?

Public attitudes toward stuttering are rooted in stereotypes and misconceptions, leading to negative reactions and discrimination against individuals who stutter. Previous research highlights the positive impact of educational interventions on people’s attitudes toward stuttering. The potential of social robots as an educational tool in the context of stuttering awareness remains unexplored. In the present study, we investigate whether a social robot can improve public attitudes when giving an interactive presentation on the topic. We compare its impact with a tablet-only condition. Additionally, we differentiate between two robot conditions—one in which the robot imitates stuttering and another where the robot has fluent speech. In the robot conditions, visuals are shown on a tablet. We used a co-design approach and incorporated the perspectives and experiences of two individuals with lived experiences of stuttering into our study design. A user study with 69 participants reveals significant improvements in attitudes across all three conditions, with no significant difference between conditions. However, participants perceived the robot as significantly “warmer,” more “attractive,” and “novel” when compared to the tablet. These findings provide valuable insights into the potential of social robots as intervention techniques for improving attitudes in the field of stuttering.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction
Published
2025-04-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3722122
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Stuttering Research and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.61
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Can Social Robots Improve People’s Attitudes toward Individuals Who Stutter?

Kerstin Dautenhahn, Shruti Chandra, Jürgen Körner
2 citations
ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction
Stuttering Research and Treatment
4.61
article

Can Social Robots Improve People’s Attitudes toward Individuals Who Stutter?

Kerstin Dautenhahn, Shruti Chandra, Jürgen Körner
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Public attitudes toward stuttering are rooted in stereotypes and misconceptions, leading to negative reactions and discrimination against individuals who stutter. Previous research highlights the positive impact of educational interventions on people’s attitudes toward stuttering. The potential of social robots as an educational tool in the context of stuttering awareness remains unexplored. In the present study, we investigate whether a social robot can improve public attitudes when giving an interactive presentation on the topic. We compare its impact with a tablet-only condition. Additionally, we differentiate between two robot conditions—one in which the robot imitates stuttering and another where the robot has fluent speech. In the robot conditions, visuals are shown on a tablet. We used a co-design approach and incorporated the perspectives and experiences of two individuals with lived experiences of stuttering into our study design. A user study with 69 participants reveals significant improvements in attitudes across all three conditions, with no significant difference between conditions. However, participants perceived the robot as significantly “warmer,” more “attractive,” and “novel” when compared to the tablet. These findings provide valuable insights into the potential of social robots as intervention techniques for improving attitudes in the field of stuttering.

ACM Transactions on Human-Robot InteractionVol. 14(4)
University of Waterloo (CA), University of Northern British Columbia (CA), Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Stuttering Research and Treatment
4.61
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.