Investigating the relationship between L2 proficiency and Miranda rights comprehension: a partial replication of Pavlenko et al. (2019)

This is a partial replication of Pavlenko et al. (2019), who demonstrated that non-native speakers of English generally fail to comprehend a common version of the Miranda warning. The present study investigates whether this finding can be replicated with a different population of non-native speakers and a different measure of Miranda comprehension. Participants’ language proficiency and Miranda comprehension were tested with a standard elicited imitation test (see Akbary et al., 2023) that included embedded Miranda warning sentences. The results largely confirmed the findings of Pavlenko et al. while also suggesting that Miranda comprehension may be somewhat higher among the immigrant population in this study than in the population examined by Pavlenko et al. The results also showed a more predictable relationship between English proficiency and Miranda comprehension than was found by Pavlenko et al. We relate these findings to best practices in the assessment of Miranda comprehension by expert witnesses.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Speech Language and the Law
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3138/ijsll-2024-0018
Primary Topic
Deception detection and forensic psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Investigating the relationship between L2 proficiency and Miranda rights comprehension: a partial replication of Pavlenko et al. (2019)

Leigh Anne Benzaia, Scott Jarvis, Mary Akbary, Hae In Park
1 links
International Journal of Speech Language and the Law
Deception detection and forensic psychology
article

Investigating the relationship between L2 proficiency and Miranda rights comprehension: a partial replication of Pavlenko et al. (2019)

Leigh Anne Benzaia, Scott Jarvis, Mary Akbary, Hae In Park
article en

Abstract

This is a partial replication of Pavlenko et al. (2019), who demonstrated that non-native speakers of English generally fail to comprehend a common version of the Miranda warning. The present study investigates whether this finding can be replicated with a different population of non-native speakers and a different measure of Miranda comprehension. Participants’ language proficiency and Miranda comprehension were tested with a standard elicited imitation test (see Akbary et al., 2023) that included embedded Miranda warning sentences. The results largely confirmed the findings of Pavlenko et al. while also suggesting that Miranda comprehension may be somewhat higher among the immigrant population in this study than in the population examined by Pavlenko et al. The results also showed a more predictable relationship between English proficiency and Miranda comprehension than was found by Pavlenko et al. We relate these findings to best practices in the assessment of Miranda comprehension by expert witnesses.

International Journal of Speech Language and the LawVol. 31(2)
Northern Arizona University (US), University of Utah (US), Kyung Hee University (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Deception detection and forensic psychology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Investigating the relationship between L2 proficiency and Miranda rights comprehension: a partial replication of Pavlenko et al. (2019) — Leigh Anne Benzaia, Scott Jarvis, et al. · International Journal of Speech Language and the Law (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS