‘I Don't Want to Do the Gender Division, but …’: A Gendered Linguistic Ideological Perspective in Talk About Schoolchildren's Writing in England

This article explores how education stakeholders in England represent primary school writing attainment along the axis of gender in the context of literacy concerns after the COVID-19 pandemic. Through a combination of corpus-based and qualitative critical discourse analyses, it shows how gendered linguistic ideological practices are reproduced in education stakeholders’ talk about children's writing. The findings reveal that while traditional gender-gap ideologies have not consistently been supported by research on children's writing since the early 2000s, they seem to still be broadly conaturalized in stakeholders’ discourses. Crucially, this conaturalization seems to be unconscious: Those interviewed seem to resist hegemonic gender stereotypes on writing attainment yet at the same time they tend to (re)produce normative gendered discourses that reify hegemonic masculine and feminine norms and perpetuate, at the practical level, inequalities in their appraisal of primary schoolchildren's writing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Gender and Language
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3138/gl-2025-1003
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Gender Studies in Language
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.87
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

‘I Don't Want to Do the Gender Division, but …’: A Gendered Linguistic Ideological Perspective in Talk About Schoolchildren's Writing in England

Elizabeth Parr, Paige Johnson, Sofia Lampropoulou, Victorina González‐Díaz
1 citations
Gender and Language
Gender Studies in Language
3.87
article

‘I Don't Want to Do the Gender Division, but …’: A Gendered Linguistic Ideological Perspective in Talk About Schoolchildren's Writing in England

Elizabeth Parr, Paige Johnson, Sofia Lampropoulou, Victorina González‐Díaz
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This article explores how education stakeholders in England represent primary school writing attainment along the axis of gender in the context of literacy concerns after the COVID-19 pandemic. Through a combination of corpus-based and qualitative critical discourse analyses, it shows how gendered linguistic ideological practices are reproduced in education stakeholders’ talk about children's writing. The findings reveal that while traditional gender-gap ideologies have not consistently been supported by research on children's writing since the early 2000s, they seem to still be broadly conaturalized in stakeholders’ discourses. Crucially, this conaturalization seems to be unconscious: Those interviewed seem to resist hegemonic gender stereotypes on writing attainment yet at the same time they tend to (re)produce normative gendered discourses that reify hegemonic masculine and feminine norms and perpetuate, at the practical level, inequalities in their appraisal of primary schoolchildren's writing.

Gender and LanguageVol. 19(1)
University of Liverpool (GB), Liverpool John Moores University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Gender Studies in Language
3.87
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.