Assessing Geographic Barriers to Access Long-Term Services and Supports in Chengdu, China: A Spatial Accessibility Analysis

China’s rapidly aging population has intensified demand for long-term services and supports (LTSSs), yet geographic disparities in accessibility persist despite policy reforms like long-term care insurance (LTCI). This study evaluates spatial inequities in Chengdu, a megacity piloting LTCI, using an enhanced two-step floating catchment area (2SFCA) method with demand intensity coefficients and a spatial mismatch index (SMI). Results reveal critically low average accessibility: 0.126 LTSS beds and 0.019 formal caregivers per thousand recipients within a 60 min travel threshold. Accessibility declines sharply along urbanization gradients, with urban cores (“first loop”) exceeding suburban “second” and “third loop” by ratios of 1.5–2.1 and 2.0–8.0, respectively. Strong correlations with impervious surface ratios (R2 = 0.513–0.643) highlight systemic urban bias in resource allocation. The SMI analysis uncovers divergent spatial mismatches: home care accessibility predominates in western suburbs due to decentralized small-scale providers, while institutional care clusters in eastern suburbs, reflecting government prioritization of facility-based services. Despite LTCI’s broad coverage (67% of Chengdu’s population), rural and peri-urban older adults face compounded barriers, including sparse LTSS facilities, inadequate transportation infrastructure, and reimbursement policies favoring urban institutional care. To address these inequities, this study proposes a multi-stakeholder framework: (1) strategic expansion of LTSS facilities in underserved suburban zones, prioritizing institutional care in the “third loop”; (2) road network optimization to reduce travel barriers in mountainous regions; (3) financial incentives (e.g., subsidies, tax breaks) to attract formal caregivers to suburban areas; (4) cross-regional LTCI coverage to enable access to adjacent district facilities; and (5) integration of informal caregivers into reimbursement systems through training and telehealth support. These interventions aim to reconcile spatial mismatches, align resource distribution with Chengdu’s urban–rural integration goals, and provide scalable insights for aging megacities in developing contexts. By bridging geospatial analytics with policy design, this study underscores the imperative of data-driven governance to ensure equitable aging-in-place for vulnerable populations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainability
Published
2025-04-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/su17073222
Primary Topic
Urban Transport and Accessibility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing Geographic Barriers to Access Long-Term Services and Supports in Chengdu, China: A Spatial Accessibility Analysis

Xiaolu Dou, Shikun Qin, Li Peng, Xueying Sun et al.
Sustainability
Urban Transport and Accessibility
article

Assessing Geographic Barriers to Access Long-Term Services and Supports in Chengdu, China: A Spatial Accessibility Analysis

Xiaolu Dou, Shikun Qin, Li Peng, Xueying Sun, Sen Lin
article en

Abstract

China’s rapidly aging population has intensified demand for long-term services and supports (LTSSs), yet geographic disparities in accessibility persist despite policy reforms like long-term care insurance (LTCI). This study evaluates spatial inequities in Chengdu, a megacity piloting LTCI, using an enhanced two-step floating catchment area (2SFCA) method with demand intensity coefficients and a spatial mismatch index (SMI). Results reveal critically low average accessibility: 0.126 LTSS beds and 0.019 formal caregivers per thousand recipients within a 60 min travel threshold. Accessibility declines sharply along urbanization gradients, with urban cores (“first loop”) exceeding suburban “second” and “third loop” by ratios of 1.5–2.1 and 2.0–8.0, respectively. Strong correlations with impervious surface ratios (R2 = 0.513–0.643) highlight systemic urban bias in resource allocation. The SMI analysis uncovers divergent spatial mismatches: home care accessibility predominates in western suburbs due to decentralized small-scale providers, while institutional care clusters in eastern suburbs, reflecting government prioritization of facility-based services. Despite LTCI’s broad coverage (67% of Chengdu’s population), rural and peri-urban older adults face compounded barriers, including sparse LTSS facilities, inadequate transportation infrastructure, and reimbursement policies favoring urban institutional care. To address these inequities, this study proposes a multi-stakeholder framework: (1) strategic expansion of LTSS facilities in underserved suburban zones, prioritizing institutional care in the “third loop”; (2) road network optimization to reduce travel barriers in mountainous regions; (3) financial incentives (e.g., subsidies, tax breaks) to attract formal caregivers to suburban areas; (4) cross-regional LTCI coverage to enable access to adjacent district facilities; and (5) integration of informal caregivers into reimbursement systems through training and telehealth support. These interventions aim to reconcile spatial mismatches, align resource distribution with Chengdu’s urban–rural integration goals, and provide scalable insights for aging megacities in developing contexts. By bridging geospatial analytics with policy design, this study underscores the imperative of data-driven governance to ensure equitable aging-in-place for vulnerable populations.

SustainabilityVol. 17(7)
Johns Hopkins University (US), Peking University (CN), Southwestern University of Finance and Economics (CN), Sichuan Normal University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Urban Transport and Accessibility
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.