<i>s</i>-Block Metal-Lanthanide Bonding: Direct Comparison of Mg–Yb and Mg–Ca Complexes

Despite considerable progress in understanding the fundamental aspects of metal-metal bonding, lanthanide-metal bonding is limited to interactions between lanthanide (Ln) metals and electron-rich <i>p</i>- or <i>d</i>-block metals. Exemplified by a Mg-Yb complex, we present synthesis and extensive computational analyses of the first <i>s</i>-block metal-Ln bond. Key to its formation is the unique Mg<sup>0</sup> complex [(BDI*)MgNa]<sub>2</sub> (<b>1</b>) which can be viewed as a dimer consisting of two magnesyl anions, (BDI*)Mg<sup>-</sup>, bridged by two Na<sup>+</sup> cations (BDI* = HC[C(<i>t</i>Bu)N-DIPeP]<sub>2</sub>, DIPeP = 2,6-CHEt<sub>2</sub>-phenyl). Reaction of dimeric <b>1</b> with (YbN''<sub>2</sub>)<sub>2</sub> (N'' = N(SiMe<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>) quantitatively gave the mixed complex [(BDI*)MgNa/YbN''<sub>2</sub>] (<b>2</b>-Yb) in which (BDI*)Mg<sup>-</sup> anions bridge between Yb<sup>2+</sup> and Na<sup>+</sup> cations (Mg-Yb: 3.466(1), Mg-Na: 3.415(1) Å). Atoms-In-Molecules shows Mg-Yb and Mg-Na bond paths corresponding to weak electrostatic interactions. Complex <b>2</b>-Yb is isostructural to previously reported [(BDI*)MgNa/CaN''<sub>2</sub>] (<b>2</b>-Ca). Weak Mg<sup>0</sup>-M<sup>2+</sup> (M = Ca, Yb) bonding is supported by facile exchange reactions with (SrN''<sub>2</sub>)<sub>2</sub> leading to formation of [(BDI*)MgNa/SrN''<sub>2</sub>] (<b>2</b>-Sr). Energy decomposition analysis (EDA-NOCV) confirmed major electrostatic Mg<sup>0</sup>-M<sup>2+</sup> bonding (63-66%), while orbital interactions are less significant (19-20%). Both, <b>2</b>-Ca and <b>2</b>-Yb show considerable Mg<sup>0</sup> → M<sup>2+</sup> electron transfer leading to oxidation-state ambiguities (Mg<sup>0</sup>-M<sup>+II</sup> ↔ Mg<sup>+I</sup>-M<sup>+I</sup>). Effective-Oxidation-State calculations assign the following metal oxidation states, Na<sup>+I</sup>-Mg<sup>0</sup>-M<sup>+II</sup>, with a reliability index of 69-72%. Despite structural and electronic similarities, there are differences in reactivities. Complex <b>2</b>-Ca reacts only as a 2-electron reducing agent whereas <b>2</b>-Yb can deliver up to three electrons. This study includes reactions with N<sub>2</sub>O, TEMPO, and Me<sub>3</sub>PX (X = O, S, Se). While only <b>2</b>-Ca could be converted in a complex with incorporated O<sup>2-</sup>, complexes with S<sup>2-</sup> or Se<sup>2-</sup> have been isolated for both.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the American Chemical Society
Published
2025-04-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.4c17853
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Inorganic Chemistry and Materials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.30

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

s-Block Metal-Lanthanide Bonding: Direct Comparison of Mg–Yb and Mg–Ca Complexes

Sandeep Kumar Thakur, Sjoerd Harder, Nil Roig, Jens Langer et al.
8 citations
Journal of the American Chemical Society
Inorganic Chemistry and Materials
4.30
article

s-Block Metal-Lanthanide Bonding: Direct Comparison of Mg–Yb and Mg–Ca Complexes

Sandeep Kumar Thakur, Sjoerd Harder, Nil Roig, Jens Langer, Johannes Maurer, Mercedes Alonso
article en
8 citations

Abstract

Despite considerable progress in understanding the fundamental aspects of metal-metal bonding, lanthanide-metal bonding is limited to interactions between lanthanide (Ln) metals and electron-rich <i>p</i>- or <i>d</i>-block metals. Exemplified by a Mg-Yb complex, we present synthesis and extensive computational analyses of the first <i>s</i>-block metal-Ln bond. Key to its formation is the unique Mg<sup>0</sup> complex [(BDI*)MgNa]<sub>2</sub> (<b>1</b>) which can be viewed as a dimer consisting of two magnesyl anions, (BDI*)Mg<sup>-</sup>, bridged by two Na<sup>+</sup> cations (BDI* = HC[C(<i>t</i>Bu)N-DIPeP]<sub>2</sub>, DIPeP = 2,6-CHEt<sub>2</sub>-phenyl). Reaction of dimeric <b>1</b> with (YbN''<sub>2</sub>)<sub>2</sub> (N'' = N(SiMe<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>) quantitatively gave the mixed complex [(BDI*)MgNa/YbN''<sub>2</sub>] (<b>2</b>-Yb) in which (BDI*)Mg<sup>-</sup> anions bridge between Yb<sup>2+</sup> and Na<sup>+</sup> cations (Mg-Yb: 3.466(1), Mg-Na: 3.415(1) Å). Atoms-In-Molecules shows Mg-Yb and Mg-Na bond paths corresponding to weak electrostatic interactions. Complex <b>2</b>-Yb is isostructural to previously reported [(BDI*)MgNa/CaN''<sub>2</sub>] (<b>2</b>-Ca). Weak Mg<sup>0</sup>-M<sup>2+</sup> (M = Ca, Yb) bonding is supported by facile exchange reactions with (SrN''<sub>2</sub>)<sub>2</sub> leading to formation of [(BDI*)MgNa/SrN''<sub>2</sub>] (<b>2</b>-Sr). Energy decomposition analysis (EDA-NOCV) confirmed major electrostatic Mg<sup>0</sup>-M<sup>2+</sup> bonding (63-66%), while orbital interactions are less significant (19-20%). Both, <b>2</b>-Ca and <b>2</b>-Yb show considerable Mg<sup>0</sup> → M<sup>2+</sup> electron transfer leading to oxidation-state ambiguities (Mg<sup>0</sup>-M<sup>+II</sup> ↔ Mg<sup>+I</sup>-M<sup>+I</sup>). Effective-Oxidation-State calculations assign the following metal oxidation states, Na<sup>+I</sup>-Mg<sup>0</sup>-M<sup>+II</sup>, with a reliability index of 69-72%. Despite structural and electronic similarities, there are differences in reactivities. Complex <b>2</b>-Ca reacts only as a 2-electron reducing agent whereas <b>2</b>-Yb can deliver up to three electrons. This study includes reactions with N<sub>2</sub>O, TEMPO, and Me<sub>3</sub>PX (X = O, S, Se). While only <b>2</b>-Ca could be converted in a complex with incorporated O<sup>2-</sup>, complexes with S<sup>2-</sup> or Se<sup>2-</sup> have been isolated for both.

Journal of the American Chemical SocietyVol. 147(15)
Vrije Universiteit Brussel (BE), Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (DE), University of Warwick (GB)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek, Vrije Universiteit Brussel
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Inorganic Chemistry and Materials
4.30
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.