How Do Emission Factors Contribute to the Uncertainty in Biomass Burning Emissions in the Amazon and Cerrado?

Fires drive global ecosystem change, impacting carbon dynamics, atmospheric composition, biodiversity, and human well-being. Biomass burning, a major outcome of fires, significantly contributes to greenhouse gas and aerosol emissions. Among these, fine particulate matter (PM2.5) is particularly concerning due to its adverse effects on air quality and health, and its substantial yet uncertain role in Earth’s energy balance. Variability in emission factors (EFs) remains a key source of uncertainty in emission estimates. This study evaluates PM2.5 emission sensitivity to EFs variability in Brazil’s Amazon and Cerrado biomes over 2002–2023 using the 3BEM_FRP model implemented in the PREP-CHEM-SRC tool. We updated the EFs with values and uncertainty ranges from Andreae (2019), which reflect a more comprehensive literature review than earlier datasets. The results reveal that the annual average PM2.5 emissions varied by up to 162% in the Amazon (1213 Gg yr−1 to 3172 Gg yr−1) and 184% in the Cerrado (601 Gg yr−1 to 1709 Gg yr−1). The Average peak emissions at the grid-cell level reached 5688 Mg yr−1 in the “Arc of Deforestation” region under the High-end EF scenario. Notably, the PM2.5 emissions from Amazon forest areas increased over time despite shrinking forest cover, indicating that Amazonian forests are becoming more vulnerable to fire. In the Cerrado, savannas are the primary land cover contributing to the total PM2.5 emissions, accounting for 64% to 80%. These findings underscore the importance of accurate, region-specific EFs for improving emission models and reducing uncertainties.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Atmosphere
Published
2025-04-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos16040423
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.30

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How Do Emission Factors Contribute to the Uncertainty in Biomass Burning Emissions in the Amazon and Cerrado?

Guilherme Mataveli, Gabriel Pereira, Valter Oliveira, Saulo R. Freitas et al.
1 citations
Atmosphere
Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
1.30
article

How Do Emission Factors Contribute to the Uncertainty in Biomass Burning Emissions in the Amazon and Cerrado?

Guilherme Mataveli, Gabriel Pereira, Valter Oliveira, Saulo R. Freitas, Luiz E. O. C. Aragão, Matthew W. Jones, Bruno Silva Oliveira
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Fires drive global ecosystem change, impacting carbon dynamics, atmospheric composition, biodiversity, and human well-being. Biomass burning, a major outcome of fires, significantly contributes to greenhouse gas and aerosol emissions. Among these, fine particulate matter (PM2.5) is particularly concerning due to its adverse effects on air quality and health, and its substantial yet uncertain role in Earth’s energy balance. Variability in emission factors (EFs) remains a key source of uncertainty in emission estimates. This study evaluates PM2.5 emission sensitivity to EFs variability in Brazil’s Amazon and Cerrado biomes over 2002–2023 using the 3BEM_FRP model implemented in the PREP-CHEM-SRC tool. We updated the EFs with values and uncertainty ranges from Andreae (2019), which reflect a more comprehensive literature review than earlier datasets. The results reveal that the annual average PM2.5 emissions varied by up to 162% in the Amazon (1213 Gg yr−1 to 3172 Gg yr−1) and 184% in the Cerrado (601 Gg yr−1 to 1709 Gg yr−1). The Average peak emissions at the grid-cell level reached 5688 Mg yr−1 in the “Arc of Deforestation” region under the High-end EF scenario. Notably, the PM2.5 emissions from Amazon forest areas increased over time despite shrinking forest cover, indicating that Amazonian forests are becoming more vulnerable to fire. In the Cerrado, savannas are the primary land cover contributing to the total PM2.5 emissions, accounting for 64% to 80%. These findings underscore the importance of accurate, region-specific EFs for improving emission models and reducing uncertainties.

AtmosphereVol. 16(4)
University of East Anglia (GB), Federal University of São João del-Rei (BR), University of Exeter (GB), Tyndall Centre (GB), Group of Institutes, Foundations and Enterprises (BR), Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (BR)
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
1.30
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.