META-ANALYSIS OF THE EFFECTS OF THE STEM TEACHING APPROACH ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF 21ST-CENTURY COMPETENCIES RELATED TO LEARNING NATURAL SCIENCES

Since the fast scientific growth has a profound impact on life in the 21st century, this research aimed to explore the effects of STEM teaching on the development of key 21st-century competencies for learning natural sciences. Consequently, four research hypotheses were formulated: the STEM approach promotes the development of creativity (H1), critical thinking (H2), problem-solving (H3), and science-processing skills (H4) to a greater extent than the traditional approach to teaching natural sciences. The validity of the hypotheses was assessed through a meta-analysis. The results of 21 studies that examined the effects of the STEM approach on the development of the above-mentioned competencies among both elementary and high-school pupils were used to calculate the corresponding mean Cohen’s d value for each of the four hypotheses. The mean Cohen’s d values for the hypotheses related to creativity and science-processing skills range between +0.500 and +0.800 which indicates a moderate positive effect. The mean Cohen’s d values for the hypotheses referring to critical thinking and problem-solving skills were higher than +0.800, indicating a strong positive effect of the STEM approach on the development of these competencies in comparison to the traditional teaching approach. Consequently, it can be concluded that all four research hypotheses posed here are confirmed. Furthermore, the findings confirm the considerable potential of the STEM teaching approach to contribute to the development of key 21st-century competencies related to learning natural sciences.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.46793/stream25.061p
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Educational Research and Pedagogy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.49
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

META-ANALYSIS OF THE EFFECTS OF THE STEM TEACHING APPROACH ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF 21ST-CENTURY COMPETENCIES RELATED TO LEARNING NATURAL SCIENCES

Katarina Putica
1 citations
Educational Research and Pedagogy
1.49
article

META-ANALYSIS OF THE EFFECTS OF THE STEM TEACHING APPROACH ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF 21ST-CENTURY COMPETENCIES RELATED TO LEARNING NATURAL SCIENCES

Katarina Putica
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Since the fast scientific growth has a profound impact on life in the 21st century, this research aimed to explore the effects of STEM teaching on the development of key 21st-century competencies for learning natural sciences. Consequently, four research hypotheses were formulated: the STEM approach promotes the development of creativity (H1), critical thinking (H2), problem-solving (H3), and science-processing skills (H4) to a greater extent than the traditional approach to teaching natural sciences. The validity of the hypotheses was assessed through a meta-analysis. The results of 21 studies that examined the effects of the STEM approach on the development of the above-mentioned competencies among both elementary and high-school pupils were used to calculate the corresponding mean Cohen’s d value for each of the four hypotheses. The mean Cohen’s d values for the hypotheses related to creativity and science-processing skills range between +0.500 and +0.800 which indicates a moderate positive effect. The mean Cohen’s d values for the hypotheses referring to critical thinking and problem-solving skills were higher than +0.800, indicating a strong positive effect of the STEM approach on the development of these competencies in comparison to the traditional teaching approach. Consequently, it can be concluded that all four research hypotheses posed here are confirmed. Furthermore, the findings confirm the considerable potential of the STEM teaching approach to contribute to the development of key 21st-century competencies related to learning natural sciences.

Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Educational Research and Pedagogy
1.49
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.