SOME REFlECTIONS ON STEAM EPISTEMIOlOGIES: SYNKRASIS, MIXIS OR SYNTHESIS?

The introduction focuses on the ancient Greek concepts of synkrasis and mixis, linking them to modern interdisciplinary frameworks and STEAM education methodologies. It emphasizes the importance of evaluating the integration quality among STEAM subjects, highlighting a tendency among educators to oversimplify these relationships. The historical emergence of disciplines in the 19th century and their implications for knowledge production is discussed, noting critiques of rigid boundaries that limit inquiry. Interdisciplinarity, while a contemporary focus, has roots in ancient understandings, yet it now often struggles against the fragmentation of knowledge. The distinctions between interdisciplinary, multidisciplinary, and transdisciplinary approaches are clarified, with transdisciplinarity positioned as a more collaborative and integrative method that transcends traditional boundaries. Transdisciplinarity is identified as a vital research principle that fosters holistic integration, essential for addressing complex global challenges. It contrasts with temporary interdisciplinary collaborations by advocating for sustained change in scientific inquiry structures. The conclusion underscores the need for a nuanced understanding of disciplines and their historical context, advocating for a revival of coherent disciplinary concepts within transdisciplinary frameworks.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.46793/stream25.091z
Primary Topic
Scientific Research and Philosophical Inquiry
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

SOME REFlECTIONS ON STEAM EPISTEMIOlOGIES: SYNKRASIS, MIXIS OR SYNTHESIS?

Predrag Živković
Scientific Research and Philosophical Inquiry
article

SOME REFlECTIONS ON STEAM EPISTEMIOlOGIES: SYNKRASIS, MIXIS OR SYNTHESIS?

Predrag Živković
article en

Abstract

The introduction focuses on the ancient Greek concepts of synkrasis and mixis, linking them to modern interdisciplinary frameworks and STEAM education methodologies. It emphasizes the importance of evaluating the integration quality among STEAM subjects, highlighting a tendency among educators to oversimplify these relationships. The historical emergence of disciplines in the 19th century and their implications for knowledge production is discussed, noting critiques of rigid boundaries that limit inquiry. Interdisciplinarity, while a contemporary focus, has roots in ancient understandings, yet it now often struggles against the fragmentation of knowledge. The distinctions between interdisciplinary, multidisciplinary, and transdisciplinary approaches are clarified, with transdisciplinarity positioned as a more collaborative and integrative method that transcends traditional boundaries. Transdisciplinarity is identified as a vital research principle that fosters holistic integration, essential for addressing complex global challenges. It contrasts with temporary interdisciplinary collaborations by advocating for sustained change in scientific inquiry structures. The conclusion underscores the need for a nuanced understanding of disciplines and their historical context, advocating for a revival of coherent disciplinary concepts within transdisciplinary frameworks.

Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Scientific Research and Philosophical Inquiry
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.