A holistic assessment framework for marine carbon dioxide removal options

Abstract Marine carbon dioxide removal (mCDR) options could potentially play an important role in future CDR policy portfolios. They include, for example, ocean alkalinity enhancement, blue carbon projects such as mangrove cultivation, as well as sub-seabed storage of captured atmospheric CO 2 . In this paper we present a novel assessment framework designed for mCDR options. The framework provides important conceptual advancements to existing frameworks currently used to assess climate options: It clearly distinguishes between and allows for the assessment of both the feasibility and desirability of mCDR options, it makes explicit the evaluative standards upon which the assessment is based and it separates the descriptive listing of information from the evaluation of said information. The assessment framework aims to advance the debate on what role mCDR can and should play in responding to the climate crisis by providing a tool for both policymakers and stakeholders to assess mCDR options in a transparent and comprehensive way.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Research Letters
Published
2025-04-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/adc93f
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.57

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A holistic assessment framework for marine carbon dioxide removal options

Christian Baatz, Christine Merk, Lukas Tank, Erik van Doorn et al.
5 citations
Environmental Research Letters
Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
3.57
article

A holistic assessment framework for marine carbon dioxide removal options

Christian Baatz, Christine Merk, Lukas Tank, Erik van Doorn, Yiannis Moustakis, Julia Pongratz, Teresa Morganti, Gregor Rehder, Miranda Boettcher, Felix Havermann, Nele Matz‐Lück, David Peter Keller, Wanxuan Yao, Matthias Kreuzburg, Nadine Mengis, Tony Cabus, Lena-Katharina Bednarz, Tabea Dorndorf, Hendrikje Wehnert, Wanda Holzhüter, Lieske Voget- Kleschin
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Abstract Marine carbon dioxide removal (mCDR) options could potentially play an important role in future CDR policy portfolios. They include, for example, ocean alkalinity enhancement, blue carbon projects such as mangrove cultivation, as well as sub-seabed storage of captured atmospheric CO 2 . In this paper we present a novel assessment framework designed for mCDR options. The framework provides important conceptual advancements to existing frameworks currently used to assess climate options: It clearly distinguishes between and allows for the assessment of both the feasibility and desirability of mCDR options, it makes explicit the evaluative standards upon which the assessment is based and it separates the descriptive listing of information from the evaluation of said information. The assessment framework aims to advance the debate on what role mCDR can and should play in responding to the climate crisis by providing a tool for both policymakers and stakeholders to assess mCDR options in a transparent and comprehensive way.

Environmental Research LettersVol. 20(5)
Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik, German Institute for International and Security Affairs (DE), Kiel Institute for the World Economy (DE), Leibniz Institute for Baltic Sea Research Warnemünde (DE), Hochschule für Angewandte Wissenschaften Kiel (DE), Leibniz Association (DE), Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel (DE), GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel (DE), Clinical Research Center Kiel (DE), Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (DE), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, Leibniz-Gemeinschaft
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
3.57
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.