Cluster dice: a simple and fast approach for instance-based semantic segmentation evaluation via many-to-many matching

In some medical image segmentation tasks, it is important to detect and segment several regions per class, e.g. different lesions, that may be of different sizes. This problem is similar to instance segmentation but is typically addressed as a semantic segmentation one followed by a post-processing step to separate the regions. It is key to develop segmentation performance metrics that account for these scenarios, which we coin as instance-sensitive segmentation, where appropriate segmentation of all instances matter. The gold standard performance metric for evaluating standard semantic segmentation tasks is the Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC). Although its design inherently tackles class imbalance, the DSC fails to faithfully capture segmentation performance across several instances presenting with instance imbalance. Large instances indeed contribute to the majority of the DSC computation and lead to an inflated performance evaluation. Lesion-wise DSC (Lw-DSC) and CC-Metrics (CCDSC) are previous approaches which address this issue by calculating an individual DSC score for each ground truth instance. These metrics rely on specific segment matching choices to pair predicted and ground-truth instances. In this work, we demonstrate that no single metric can holistically evaluate instance imbalance. Further, we propose Cluster-Dice (C-DSC), one of the first segment matching schemes which allows the merging of ground truth instances. This simple framework is easy to define and implement, transparent, and highly efficient to allow for rapid evaluation, and can accommodate boundary-based metrics as well.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-04-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1117/12.3047296
Primary Topic
Topic Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cluster dice: a simple and fast approach for instance-based semantic segmentation evaluation via many-to-many matching

Tom Vercauteren, Theodore Barfoot, Aaron Kujawa, Marina Ivory et al.
Topic Modeling
article

Cluster dice: a simple and fast approach for instance-based semantic segmentation evaluation via many-to-many matching

Tom Vercauteren, Theodore Barfoot, Aaron Kujawa, Marina Ivory, Jonathan Shapey, Soumya Snigdha Kundu
article en

Abstract

In some medical image segmentation tasks, it is important to detect and segment several regions per class, e.g. different lesions, that may be of different sizes. This problem is similar to instance segmentation but is typically addressed as a semantic segmentation one followed by a post-processing step to separate the regions. It is key to develop segmentation performance metrics that account for these scenarios, which we coin as instance-sensitive segmentation, where appropriate segmentation of all instances matter. The gold standard performance metric for evaluating standard semantic segmentation tasks is the Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC). Although its design inherently tackles class imbalance, the DSC fails to faithfully capture segmentation performance across several instances presenting with instance imbalance. Large instances indeed contribute to the majority of the DSC computation and lead to an inflated performance evaluation. Lesion-wise DSC (Lw-DSC) and CC-Metrics (CCDSC) are previous approaches which address this issue by calculating an individual DSC score for each ground truth instance. These metrics rely on specific segment matching choices to pair predicted and ground-truth instances. In this work, we demonstrate that no single metric can holistically evaluate instance imbalance. Further, we propose Cluster-Dice (C-DSC), one of the first segment matching schemes which allows the merging of ground truth instances. This simple framework is easy to define and implement, transparent, and highly efficient to allow for rapid evaluation, and can accommodate boundary-based metrics as well.

King's College London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Topic Modeling
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.