Impact of Different Operational Voltage Windows in a Micro-Cycle Formation Process on NMC811||Graphite and NMC811||Graphite/SiO<sub>x</sub> Pouch Cells

Optimization of the formation process can be a major driver for cost reduction in lithium ion battery cell production. To further tune the formation process, a deeper understanding of the effect of the voltage window during operation is required. In this regard, formation processes based on micro-cycles, i.e. cycles within different voltage windows, were used with NMC811||graphite and NM811||graphite/10%SiO x 1 Ah pouch cells. Three different micro-cycle formation voltage windows were investigated: 3.0 V–3.5 V (P1), 3.6 V–3.7 V (P2) and 4.0 V–4.2 V (P3). The P1 formation process achieved on average 3% more discharge capacity after 300 cycles for the NMC811||graphite based cells. For the SiO x containing cells, a large voltage window (P3) formation process is the least suitable, leading to an average of 4% lower discharge capacity after 300 cycles. These differences in discharge capacity were attributable to capacity loss within the formation and the initial aging cycle, rather than capacity retention. Furthermore, gas evolution and VC electrolyte additive consumption during the formation process were notably lower for the SiO x containing cells.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of The Electrochemical Society
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1149/1945-7111/adc953
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Silicon and Solar Cell Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.73

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of Different Operational Voltage Windows in a Micro-Cycle Formation Process on NMC811||Graphite and NMC811||Graphite/SiOx Pouch Cells

Martin Winter, Philip Niehoff, Johanna Kauling, Maik Stamm et al.
1 citations
Journal of The Electrochemical Society
Silicon and Solar Cell Technologies
0.73
article

Impact of Different Operational Voltage Windows in a Micro-Cycle Formation Process on NMC811||Graphite and NMC811||Graphite/SiOx Pouch Cells

Martin Winter, Philip Niehoff, Johanna Kauling, Maik Stamm, Bastian Heidrich, Matthias Hartmann
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Optimization of the formation process can be a major driver for cost reduction in lithium ion battery cell production. To further tune the formation process, a deeper understanding of the effect of the voltage window during operation is required. In this regard, formation processes based on micro-cycles, i.e. cycles within different voltage windows, were used with NMC811||graphite and NM811||graphite/10%SiO x 1 Ah pouch cells. Three different micro-cycle formation voltage windows were investigated: 3.0 V–3.5 V (P1), 3.6 V–3.7 V (P2) and 4.0 V–4.2 V (P3). The P1 formation process achieved on average 3% more discharge capacity after 300 cycles for the NMC811||graphite based cells. For the SiO x containing cells, a large voltage window (P3) formation process is the least suitable, leading to an average of 4% lower discharge capacity after 300 cycles. These differences in discharge capacity were attributable to capacity loss within the formation and the initial aging cycle, rather than capacity retention. Furthermore, gas evolution and VC electrolyte additive consumption during the formation process were notably lower for the SiO x containing cells.

Journal of The Electrochemical SocietyVol. 172(4)
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Silicon and Solar Cell Technologies
0.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.