Screening system for assessing suitability of cognitive behavioral therapy for chronic low back pain

An objective method to evaluate patient suitability for cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for chronic low back pain (LBP) is currently lacking. Inappropriate application can result in prolonged hospital visits and increased medical costs. Therefore, identifying an objective biomarker for evaluating suitability is crucial. This study focused on electroencephalogram (EEG) complexity as a potential biomarker for evaluating CBT suitability for chronic LBP, assessing its discriminative ability and identifying factors that impede treatment. Complexity was analyzed as multiscale fuzzy sample entropy (MFSE). Fifty patients with suspected psychosocial factors causing LBP along with 20 healthy volunteers were included. The analysis included 25 responders and 25 non-responders for CBT. MFSE showed significant effects of scale factor [F(19,171) = 14.82, p < 0.01, partial η<sup>2</sup> = 0.622] and interaction between group and scale factor [F(38,171) = 7.34, p < 0.01, partial η<sup>2</sup> = 0.620]. The low-frequency band MFSE score had an odds ratio of 10.768 (95% confidence interval: 8.263-10.044, p < 0.001). The low-frequency band showed a high discriminative ability (area under the curve: 0.825), with a cut-off value of 1.25. The low-frequency FMSE is a superior biomarker for predicting suitability for CBT. This method can quickly evaluate suitability, reducing the burden on medical professionals and patients, and lowering medical costs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-04-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-95948-1
Primary Topic
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Screening system for assessing suitability of cognitive behavioral therapy for chronic low back pain

Seiji Ohtori, Hiroto Chikubu, Sumihisa Orita, Kazuhide Inage et al.
Scientific Reports
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
article

Screening system for assessing suitability of cognitive behavioral therapy for chronic low back pain

Seiji Ohtori, Hiroto Chikubu, Sumihisa Orita, Kazuhide Inage, Masahiro Inoue, Yasuhiro Shiga, Yawara Eguchi, Mitsuo Morita, Ayako Ono, Akiko Ichihara, Keisuke Shimizu
article en

Abstract

An objective method to evaluate patient suitability for cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for chronic low back pain (LBP) is currently lacking. Inappropriate application can result in prolonged hospital visits and increased medical costs. Therefore, identifying an objective biomarker for evaluating suitability is crucial. This study focused on electroencephalogram (EEG) complexity as a potential biomarker for evaluating CBT suitability for chronic LBP, assessing its discriminative ability and identifying factors that impede treatment. Complexity was analyzed as multiscale fuzzy sample entropy (MFSE). Fifty patients with suspected psychosocial factors causing LBP along with 20 healthy volunteers were included. The analysis included 25 responders and 25 non-responders for CBT. MFSE showed significant effects of scale factor [F(19,171) = 14.82, p < 0.01, partial η<sup>2</sup> = 0.622] and interaction between group and scale factor [F(38,171) = 7.34, p < 0.01, partial η<sup>2</sup> = 0.620]. The low-frequency band MFSE score had an odds ratio of 10.768 (95% confidence interval: 8.263-10.044, p < 0.001). The low-frequency band showed a high discriminative ability (area under the curve: 0.825), with a cut-off value of 1.25. The low-frequency FMSE is a superior biomarker for predicting suitability for CBT. This method can quickly evaluate suitability, reducing the burden on medical professionals and patients, and lowering medical costs.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Chiba University (JP), Chiba University Hospital (JP)
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.