Collaborations and Policy Direction for Sustainability‐Focused Gene‐Edited Foods Research

ABSTRACT Gene‐edited foods can contribute to adequate and nutritious food to alleviate the challenge of feeding a growing population under severe constraints imposed by climate change and land use. However, genetically engineered (GE) foods R&D, the knowledge source for gene‐edited foods that focuses on commercial gains and neglects sustainability outcomes, cannot be expected to achieve longer‐term public good. To represent R&D outputs, we examined GE foods–related patents' abstracts, where we found negligible mentions of sustainability outcomes. To correct for embedding sustainability, through network analysis of the current ultimate parents of the patents' co‐assignees, we profiled the past collaborations capable of creating GE foods knowledge and their research inclinations. On investigating the entity types involved directly and indirectly in these collaborations, we observed a near‐omnipresence of national policy bodies and national research institutes. Based on these insights superimposed on the prevailing socio‐technological conditions, we proposed sustainability‐focused R&D policy directions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainable Development
Published
2025-04-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.3459
Primary Topic
Bioeconomy and Sustainability Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Collaborations and Policy Direction for Sustainability‐Focused Gene‐Edited Foods Research

Yuya Kajikawa, Cristian Mejía, Ranjit Gupta
Sustainable Development
Bioeconomy and Sustainability Development
article

Collaborations and Policy Direction for Sustainability‐Focused Gene‐Edited Foods Research

Yuya Kajikawa, Cristian Mejía, Ranjit Gupta
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Gene‐edited foods can contribute to adequate and nutritious food to alleviate the challenge of feeding a growing population under severe constraints imposed by climate change and land use. However, genetically engineered (GE) foods R&D, the knowledge source for gene‐edited foods that focuses on commercial gains and neglects sustainability outcomes, cannot be expected to achieve longer‐term public good. To represent R&D outputs, we examined GE foods–related patents' abstracts, where we found negligible mentions of sustainability outcomes. To correct for embedding sustainability, through network analysis of the current ultimate parents of the patents' co‐assignees, we profiled the past collaborations capable of creating GE foods knowledge and their research inclinations. On investigating the entity types involved directly and indirectly in these collaborations, we observed a near‐omnipresence of national policy bodies and national research institutes. Based on these insights superimposed on the prevailing socio‐technological conditions, we proposed sustainability‐focused R&D policy directions.

Sustainable DevelopmentVol. 33(4)
Chulalongkorn University (TH), The University of Tokyo (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Bioeconomy and Sustainability Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.