The Costs and Benefits of Clean Cooking Policies in Low‐ and Middle‐Income Countries Under Real‐World Conditions

ABSTRACT Clean cooking technologies have the potential to deliver substantial health, environmental, climate, and gender equity benefits. We use the BAR‐HAP model to conduct the first global analysis of the regional and global costs and benefits of several subsidy and financing policies supporting household transitions to cleaner technologies. The analysis provides evidence‐based estimates of these interventions' impacts, while remaining conservative about factors such as stove usage, subsidy leakage, and exposure levels, for which there remains considerable uncertainty. These conservative assumptions notwithstanding, we show that policies supporting a clean cooking transition would deliver net benefits of 1.4 trillion USD from 2020 to 2050 across 120 LMICs; the promotion of improved‐efficiency biomass stoves alongside fully clean technologies yields lower net social benefits. Most monetized benefits are from health—especially mortality—improvements, followed by averted CO2e. Although considerable investment will be needed to realize these benefits, the economic case for scaling up policy action is strong. Moreover, because the effectiveness of cooking transition policies is currently low, research and innovation on incentive designs to achieve more exclusive clean fuel use is sorely needed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainable Development
Published
2025-04-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.3463
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Energy and Environment Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.02

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Costs and Benefits of Clean Cooking Policies in Low‐ and Middle‐Income Countries Under Real‐World Conditions

Marc Jeuland, Ryanne Fujita‐Conrads, Kendra N. Williams, Ipsita Das et al.
6 citations
Sustainable Development
Energy and Environment Impacts
3.02
article

The Costs and Benefits of Clean Cooking Policies in Low‐ and Middle‐Income Countries Under Real‐World Conditions

Marc Jeuland, Ryanne Fujita‐Conrads, Kendra N. Williams, Ipsita Das, Yutong Xue, Heather Adair‐Rohani, Karin Troncoso, Selena Kay D. Galeos, Jiahui Zong, Jessica Lewis
article en
6 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Clean cooking technologies have the potential to deliver substantial health, environmental, climate, and gender equity benefits. We use the BAR‐HAP model to conduct the first global analysis of the regional and global costs and benefits of several subsidy and financing policies supporting household transitions to cleaner technologies. The analysis provides evidence‐based estimates of these interventions' impacts, while remaining conservative about factors such as stove usage, subsidy leakage, and exposure levels, for which there remains considerable uncertainty. These conservative assumptions notwithstanding, we show that policies supporting a clean cooking transition would deliver net benefits of 1.4 trillion USD from 2020 to 2050 across 120 LMICs; the promotion of improved‐efficiency biomass stoves alongside fully clean technologies yields lower net social benefits. Most monetized benefits are from health—especially mortality—improvements, followed by averted CO2e. Although considerable investment will be needed to realize these benefits, the economic case for scaling up policy action is strong. Moreover, because the effectiveness of cooking transition policies is currently low, research and innovation on incentive designs to achieve more exclusive clean fuel use is sorely needed.

Sustainable DevelopmentVol. 33(4)
Duke University (US), World Health Organization (CH), Duke Institute for Health Innovation (US), Pratt Institute (US)
World Health Organization
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Energy and Environment Impacts
3.02
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.