Project or Factorize? A Case Study of Multiview CCA and PARAFAC2 Tensor Factorization

Consider learning the shared representations from multiple unlabeled views. Previous work either projects different views to the same space while enforcing the agreement among the projected views such as multiview canonical correlation analysis (MCCA), or factorizes different views while ensuring the common latent components across the views such as PARAFAC2, a tensor decomposition method. In this paper we first investigate a fundamental question: “Do these two approaches learn different representations?” Preliminary numerical results suggest that in practice they do, which, in turn, begs the question of how we can leverage this observation in order to compute a superior representation. In this paper, we present a simple proof-of-concept scheme which augments MCCA with PARAFAC2 representations and vice-versa, and we demonstrate on multiple real datasets that such scheme can improve upon the baseline representation, paving the way for future research on optimally combining the strengths of projection and factorization methods for multiview representation learning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/ieeeconf60004.2024.10942863
Primary Topic
Tensor decomposition and applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Project or Factorize? A Case Study of Multiview CCA and PARAFAC2 Tensor Factorization

Evangelos E. Papalexakis, Jia Chen
Tensor decomposition and applications
article

Project or Factorize? A Case Study of Multiview CCA and PARAFAC2 Tensor Factorization

Evangelos E. Papalexakis, Jia Chen
article en

Abstract

Consider learning the shared representations from multiple unlabeled views. Previous work either projects different views to the same space while enforcing the agreement among the projected views such as multiview canonical correlation analysis (MCCA), or factorizes different views while ensuring the common latent components across the views such as PARAFAC2, a tensor decomposition method. In this paper we first investigate a fundamental question: “Do these two approaches learn different representations?” Preliminary numerical results suggest that in practice they do, which, in turn, begs the question of how we can leverage this observation in order to compute a superior representation. In this paper, we present a simple proof-of-concept scheme which augments MCCA with PARAFAC2 representations and vice-versa, and we demonstrate on multiple real datasets that such scheme can improve upon the baseline representation, paving the way for future research on optimally combining the strengths of projection and factorization methods for multiview representation learning.

University of California, Riverside (US)
National Science Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Tensor decomposition and applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Project or Factorize? A Case Study of Multiview CCA and PARAFAC2 Tensor Factorization — Evangelos E. Papalexakis, Jia Chen · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS