GeMuFuzz: Integrating Generative and Mutational Fuzzing with Deep Learning

Current grey-box protocol fuzzers may not work well with poor-quality initial seeds. That makes it difficult to cover diverse message types and protocol states defined in the protocol specification. To mitigate this issue, we propose GeMuFuzz, which integrates deep learning based seed generation into mutation-based grey-box fuzzing. Moreover, GeMuFuzz considers the high-dimensional information implied in seeds generated during fuzzing. We also evaluated the performance of GeMuFuzz by comparing with the baseline fuzzer AFLNET on 8 typical protocol implementations of ProFuzzBench. GeMuFuzz discovered 5.07% more paths and 6.19% more crashes, as well as 8.57% more states and 10.54% more state transitions than AFLNET. The experimental results highlight that GeMuFuzz could improve the effectiveness of fuzzing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-12-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/trustcom63139.2024.00261
Primary Topic
Machine Learning and Data Classification
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

GeMuFuzz: Integrating Generative and Mutational Fuzzing with Deep Learning

Zheng Zhang, Hongming Chen, Siqi Zhao, Rui Ma et al.
Machine Learning and Data Classification
article

GeMuFuzz: Integrating Generative and Mutational Fuzzing with Deep Learning

Zheng Zhang, Hongming Chen, Siqi Zhao, Rui Ma, Yuqi Zhai, Yuche Yang
article en

Abstract

Current grey-box protocol fuzzers may not work well with poor-quality initial seeds. That makes it difficult to cover diverse message types and protocol states defined in the protocol specification. To mitigate this issue, we propose GeMuFuzz, which integrates deep learning based seed generation into mutation-based grey-box fuzzing. Moreover, GeMuFuzz considers the high-dimensional information implied in seeds generated during fuzzing. We also evaluated the performance of GeMuFuzz by comparing with the baseline fuzzer AFLNET on 8 typical protocol implementations of ProFuzzBench. GeMuFuzz discovered 5.07% more paths and 6.19% more crashes, as well as 8.57% more states and 10.54% more state transitions than AFLNET. The experimental results highlight that GeMuFuzz could improve the effectiveness of fuzzing.

Beijing Institute of Technology (CN), Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Machine Learning and Data Classification
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.