The future of dispute resolution in international trade

Abstract Given ongoing dysfunction of the World Trade Organization's Appellate Body, the focus of this article is on the future of trade dispute resolution, with evaluation of two questions: (i) What is the current status of WTO dispute resolution as compared to that conducted through existing preferential trade agreements (PTAs)? and (ii) What are the evolving approaches of the United States and EU to trade policy/trade dispute resolution? The overall conclusion is that, by applying “power‐based” bargaining to a broad range of trade policy issues, the United States is contributing to increased trade policy uncertainty.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy
Published
2025-04-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/aepp.13518
Citations
2
Primary Topic
World Trade Organization Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
17.04
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The future of dispute resolution in international trade

Ian M. Sheldon, Daniel C. K. Chow
2 citations
Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy
World Trade Organization Law
17.04
article

The future of dispute resolution in international trade

Ian M. Sheldon, Daniel C. K. Chow
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Given ongoing dysfunction of the World Trade Organization's Appellate Body, the focus of this article is on the future of trade dispute resolution, with evaluation of two questions: (i) What is the current status of WTO dispute resolution as compared to that conducted through existing preferential trade agreements (PTAs)? and (ii) What are the evolving approaches of the United States and EU to trade policy/trade dispute resolution? The overall conclusion is that, by applying “power‐based” bargaining to a broad range of trade policy issues, the United States is contributing to increased trade policy uncertainty.

Applied Economic Perspectives and PolicyVol. 47(4)
The Ohio State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
World Trade Organization Law
17.04
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.