Relationship between phenotypic subcutaneous backfat thickness and spermiogram outcomes in young beef bulls

This study investigated the relationship between subcutaneous backfat thickness (SCBF) and semen quality in young beef bulls. We hypothesized that bulls with increased SCBF would have decreased semen quality compared with bulls of adequate SCBF, despite being fed the same diet. Data collected from yearling beef bulls (<i>n</i> = 710) enrolled in two bull development programs were utilized in an observational retrospective cohort study. Bulls were developed according to industry standard practices and growth performance was evaluated over 84 or 112 d following a 14- or 21-d adaptation period. At the end of the growth performance evaluation period, carcass ultrasonography was performed to evaluate ribeye area (REA), SCBF, and intramuscular fat. Furthermore, breeding soundness examinations (BSE) were performed within 40 d after carcass ultrasonography. Bulls that failed the BSE for reasons unrelated to semen quality were excluded from this study. To evaluate the relationship between SCBF and fertility variables, bulls were categorized into three cohorts based on SCBF estimates using two distinct thresholds. Within each location and year, bulls were retrospectively ranked according to their SCBF and classified into the top 10% (TOP10; n = 71), middle 80% (MID80; n = 569), and bottom 10% (BTM10; n = 70). To further investigate the relationship between SCBF and fertility, bulls were also categorized into the top 20% (TOP20; n = 153), middle 60% (MID60; n = 419), and bottom 20% (BTM20; n = 138) based on SCBF. TOP10 and TOP20 bulls had greater initial and final body weight, SCBF, REA, and IMF (<i>P</i> ≤ 0.01) compared with their respective cohorts. In contrast, SCBF classifications did not impact average daily gain, scrotal circumference, and sperm motility (<i>P</i> ≥ 0.29). The percentage of morphologically normal sperm was decreased in TOP10 and TOP20 bulls compared with their respective cohorts (<i>P </i>< 0.01), which are similar among them (<i>P </i>≥ 0.31). These differences resulted in a greater proportion of TOP10 (<i>P</i> < 0.01) and TOP20 (<i>P</i> < 0.01) bulls classified as deferred compared with their respective cohorts. In summary, elevated SCBF in bulls exposed to the same diet was associated with an increase in sperm morphological abnormalities and resulted in a larger proportion of bulls classified as deferred during their first BSE.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Translational Animal Science
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/tas/txaf039
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.45

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Relationship between phenotypic subcutaneous backfat thickness and spermiogram outcomes in young beef bulls

R. L. Stewart, Jason Duggin, Molly Sloan Smith, Pedro L P Fontes et al.
3 citations
Translational Animal Science
Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
5.45
article

Relationship between phenotypic subcutaneous backfat thickness and spermiogram outcomes in young beef bulls

R. L. Stewart, Jason Duggin, Molly Sloan Smith, Pedro L P Fontes, Francine Henry, Grace Nyhuis, Saulo Menegatti Zoca, Jorge Octavio Solano Aguilar, Lew G Strickland
article en
3 citations

Abstract

This study investigated the relationship between subcutaneous backfat thickness (SCBF) and semen quality in young beef bulls. We hypothesized that bulls with increased SCBF would have decreased semen quality compared with bulls of adequate SCBF, despite being fed the same diet. Data collected from yearling beef bulls (<i>n</i> = 710) enrolled in two bull development programs were utilized in an observational retrospective cohort study. Bulls were developed according to industry standard practices and growth performance was evaluated over 84 or 112 d following a 14- or 21-d adaptation period. At the end of the growth performance evaluation period, carcass ultrasonography was performed to evaluate ribeye area (REA), SCBF, and intramuscular fat. Furthermore, breeding soundness examinations (BSE) were performed within 40 d after carcass ultrasonography. Bulls that failed the BSE for reasons unrelated to semen quality were excluded from this study. To evaluate the relationship between SCBF and fertility variables, bulls were categorized into three cohorts based on SCBF estimates using two distinct thresholds. Within each location and year, bulls were retrospectively ranked according to their SCBF and classified into the top 10% (TOP10; n = 71), middle 80% (MID80; n = 569), and bottom 10% (BTM10; n = 70). To further investigate the relationship between SCBF and fertility, bulls were also categorized into the top 20% (TOP20; n = 153), middle 60% (MID60; n = 419), and bottom 20% (BTM20; n = 138) based on SCBF. TOP10 and TOP20 bulls had greater initial and final body weight, SCBF, REA, and IMF (<i>P</i> ≤ 0.01) compared with their respective cohorts. In contrast, SCBF classifications did not impact average daily gain, scrotal circumference, and sperm motility (<i>P</i> ≥ 0.29). The percentage of morphologically normal sperm was decreased in TOP10 and TOP20 bulls compared with their respective cohorts (<i>P </i>< 0.01), which are similar among them (<i>P </i>≥ 0.31). These differences resulted in a greater proportion of TOP10 (<i>P</i> < 0.01) and TOP20 (<i>P</i> < 0.01) bulls classified as deferred compared with their respective cohorts. In summary, elevated SCBF in bulls exposed to the same diet was associated with an increase in sperm morphological abnormalities and resulted in a larger proportion of bulls classified as deferred during their first BSE.

Translational Animal ScienceVol. 9
University of Georgia (US), University of Tennessee at Knoxville (US)
U.S. Department of Agriculture
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
5.45
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.