Industry Insights Into Kinematics and Injury Risk for Far-Side Occupants During Electric Vehicle Side Pole Impact Accidents

With the rapid growth in the number of electric vehicles equipped with advanced consumer electronics, the rate of impact accidents has also been rising year by year. Side pole impact tests are an important method for evaluating the collision safety of these modern electric vehicles. The purpose of this study is to gain industry insights into the kinematics and injury risk for far-side occupants in electric vehicle side pole impacts. This study uses a full-scale finite element model of an electric vehicle and a human body finite element model to conduct an in-depth analysis of the occupant’s kinematic response and the risk of injury to the head, neck, chest, and internal organs under various conditions by changing the relative position and impact angle between the rigid pole and the vehicle. The results show that the seatbelt fails to effectively restrict the upper body movement of the occupants, leading to the occupants slipping out of the seatbelt; the position of the impact significantly affects the injury risk to the occupants, with the highest probability of injury occurring during an A pillar impact and a lowest probability during a C pillar impact. In 28%–40% of the cases, the risk of far-side occupants sustaining serious head and brain abbreviated injury scale AIS 3+ injuries exceeds 40%, and in 22% of the cases, the probability of occupants sustaining diffuse axonal injuries based on which metric is higher than 40%; there is no correlation between the head injury criterion HIC15 and the impact angle, but a weak correlation exists between HIC15 and maximum principal strain (MPS); a strong positive correlation is found between the impact angle and brain injury criterion BrIC/MPS. The predicted MPS of nearly 40% and 80% of the far-side occupants’ anterior longitudinal ligament and posterior longitudinal ligament exceeds the injury threshold, respectively, while in all cases, the predicted MPS of the occupants’ capsular ligament and interspinous ligament exceeds the injury threshold, which indicates an extremely high risk of ligament injury. The peak strains of the internal organs of all far-side occupants exceed the threshold, indicating that the occurrence of these internal organ injuries mainly stems from a viscous mechanism, and the peak strains have a strong positive correlation with the impact angle.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics
Published
2025-04-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/tce.2025.3557871
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.56

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Industry Insights Into Kinematics and Injury Risk for Far-Side Occupants During Electric Vehicle Side Pole Impact Accidents

Lin Hu, Fang Wang, Yu Liu, Zhou Zhou et al.
3 citations
IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics
Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics
4.56
article

Industry Insights Into Kinematics and Injury Risk for Far-Side Occupants During Electric Vehicle Side Pole Impact Accidents

Lin Hu, Fang Wang, Yu Liu, Zhou Zhou, Zhangchi Liu, Long Chun-guang, Yuanpeng Lv
article en
3 citations

Abstract

With the rapid growth in the number of electric vehicles equipped with advanced consumer electronics, the rate of impact accidents has also been rising year by year. Side pole impact tests are an important method for evaluating the collision safety of these modern electric vehicles. The purpose of this study is to gain industry insights into the kinematics and injury risk for far-side occupants in electric vehicle side pole impacts. This study uses a full-scale finite element model of an electric vehicle and a human body finite element model to conduct an in-depth analysis of the occupant’s kinematic response and the risk of injury to the head, neck, chest, and internal organs under various conditions by changing the relative position and impact angle between the rigid pole and the vehicle. The results show that the seatbelt fails to effectively restrict the upper body movement of the occupants, leading to the occupants slipping out of the seatbelt; the position of the impact significantly affects the injury risk to the occupants, with the highest probability of injury occurring during an A pillar impact and a lowest probability during a C pillar impact. In 28%–40% of the cases, the risk of far-side occupants sustaining serious head and brain abbreviated injury scale AIS 3+ injuries exceeds 40%, and in 22% of the cases, the probability of occupants sustaining diffuse axonal injuries based on which metric is higher than 40%; there is no correlation between the head injury criterion HIC15 and the impact angle, but a weak correlation exists between HIC15 and maximum principal strain (MPS); a strong positive correlation is found between the impact angle and brain injury criterion BrIC/MPS. The predicted MPS of nearly 40% and 80% of the far-side occupants’ anterior longitudinal ligament and posterior longitudinal ligament exceeds the injury threshold, respectively, while in all cases, the predicted MPS of the occupants’ capsular ligament and interspinous ligament exceeds the injury threshold, which indicates an extremely high risk of ligament injury. The peak strains of the internal organs of all far-side occupants exceed the threshold, indicating that the occurrence of these internal organ injuries mainly stems from a viscous mechanism, and the peak strains have a strong positive correlation with the impact angle.

IEEE Transactions on Consumer ElectronicsVol. 71(2)
China Automotive Engineering Research Institute (CN), Changsha University of Science and Technology (CN), KTH Royal Institute of Technology (SE)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Science and Technology Innovative Research Team in Higher Educational Institutions of Hunan Province
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics
4.56
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.