Authors’ reply to the Discussion of ‘Frequentist prediction sets for species abundance using indirect information’ at the ‘Discussion meeting on the analysis of citizen science data’

To begin, we would like to thank all discussants for their insightful comments on our article, and congratulate Dennis, Diana, Matechou, Morgan, Koh, and Opitz on their contributions to the discussion meeting that enabled such an enriching conversation on analysis of citizen science data.Much of the discussion comments pertain to how our proposed framework coincides with unique concerns of citizen science data.In what follows, we group common themes that arose in the discussion and respond.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (Statistics in Society)
Published
2025-04-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jrsssa/qnaf040
Primary Topic
Species Distribution and Climate Change
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Authors’ reply to the Discussion of ‘Frequentist prediction sets for species abundance using indirect information’ at the ‘Discussion meeting on the analysis of citizen science data’

Elizabeth Bersson, Peter D. Hoff
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (Statistics in Society)
Species Distribution and Climate Change
article

Authors’ reply to the Discussion of ‘Frequentist prediction sets for species abundance using indirect information’ at the ‘Discussion meeting on the analysis of citizen science data’

Elizabeth Bersson, Peter D. Hoff
article en

Abstract

To begin, we would like to thank all discussants for their insightful comments on our article, and congratulate Dennis, Diana, Matechou, Morgan, Koh, and Opitz on their contributions to the discussion meeting that enabled such an enriching conversation on analysis of citizen science data.Much of the discussion comments pertain to how our proposed framework coincides with unique concerns of citizen science data.In what follows, we group common themes that arose in the discussion and respond.

Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (Statistics in Society)Vol. 188(3)
Statistical and Applied Mathematical Sciences Institute (US), Duke University (US), Decision Systems (United States) (US), Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Species Distribution and Climate Change
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.