Authors’ reply to the Discussion of ‘Frequentist prediction sets for species abundance using indirect information’ at the ‘Discussion meeting on the analysis of citizen science data’
To begin, we would like to thank all discussants for their insightful comments on our article, and congratulate Dennis, Diana, Matechou, Morgan, Koh, and Opitz on their contributions to the discussion meeting that enabled such an enriching conversation on analysis of citizen science data.Much of the discussion comments pertain to how our proposed framework coincides with unique concerns of citizen science data.In what follows, we group common themes that arose in the discussion and respond.
Authors
- Elizabeth Bersson (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5453-5770)
- Peter D. Hoff (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8041-0322)
Institutions
- Statistical and Applied Mathematical Sciences Institute (US)
- Duke University (US)
- Decision Systems (United States) (US)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (Statistics in Society)
- Published
- 2025-04-04
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1093/jrsssa/qnaf040
- Primary Topic
- Species Distribution and Climate Change
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00