Unlocking the full potential of low-flow sampling and purging activities through aquifer hydraulic conductivity estimation: Strengths and limitations

Abstract A novel approach has recently been proposed to investigate the use of steady-state groundwater levels in monitoring wells during low-flow purging and sampling (LFPS) to determine the aquifer hydraulic conductivity, typically estimated by slug test (ST) methods. Specifically, during the LFPS of monitoring wells, it is possible to use the collected drawdown data to estimate the horizontal hydraulic conductivity ( K H ). In this study, the results of K H estimations, given by both ST and LFPS methods, are presented for a small landfill site in central Italy, together with transient analyses on water level data collected during LFPS, carried out and added to the usual steady-state ones for the first time. The results obtained by LFPS showed a very high correlation with K H values obtained by KGS model interpretation of ST data. In addition, different flow models have been applied to the same measured data of LFPS, affecting results no more than a factor of three. These outcomes highlighted the great potential of low-flow purging data to estimate hydraulic conductivity. This procedure, taking advantage of routine groundwater quality monitoring operations, can provide stakeholders with a very large amount of quantitative data on aquifer conditions over time, reducing time and costs for site characterization, particularly in cases of potential contamination.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Hydrogeology Journal
Published
2025-04-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-025-02887-2
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Groundwater flow and contamination studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.80
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unlocking the full potential of low-flow sampling and purging activities through aquifer hydraulic conductivity estimation: Strengths and limitations

G. L. Robbins, Francesco Maria De Filippi, Giuseppe Sappa
1 citations
Hydrogeology Journal
Groundwater flow and contamination studies
0.80
article

Unlocking the full potential of low-flow sampling and purging activities through aquifer hydraulic conductivity estimation: Strengths and limitations

G. L. Robbins, Francesco Maria De Filippi, Giuseppe Sappa
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract A novel approach has recently been proposed to investigate the use of steady-state groundwater levels in monitoring wells during low-flow purging and sampling (LFPS) to determine the aquifer hydraulic conductivity, typically estimated by slug test (ST) methods. Specifically, during the LFPS of monitoring wells, it is possible to use the collected drawdown data to estimate the horizontal hydraulic conductivity ( K H ). In this study, the results of K H estimations, given by both ST and LFPS methods, are presented for a small landfill site in central Italy, together with transient analyses on water level data collected during LFPS, carried out and added to the usual steady-state ones for the first time. The results obtained by LFPS showed a very high correlation with K H values obtained by KGS model interpretation of ST data. In addition, different flow models have been applied to the same measured data of LFPS, affecting results no more than a factor of three. These outcomes highlighted the great potential of low-flow purging data to estimate hydraulic conductivity. This procedure, taking advantage of routine groundwater quality monitoring operations, can provide stakeholders with a very large amount of quantitative data on aquifer conditions over time, reducing time and costs for site characterization, particularly in cases of potential contamination.

Hydrogeology JournalVol. 33(3)
University of Connecticut (US), Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Groundwater flow and contamination studies
0.80
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.