Energy under debate: Fostering critical thinking in chemical engineering through in-class debates

This paper examines the use of in-class debates as a collaborative learning technique in the teaching of Chemical Engineering, as part of a third-year course in the Chemistry degree. "The aim is to evaluate its effectiveness in developing critical thinking and argumentative skills, while promoting awareness of sustainable energy aligned with the United Nations' Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 7, which aims to ensure access to affordable, reliable, sustainable, and modern energy for all (United Nations, 2015). Over two academic years (2022–2024), students participated in debates on various energy sources, including nuclear, wind, solar or tidal energy, among others. The debates encouraged students to engage with diverse perspectives, apply their theoretical knowledge, and defend positions contrary to their own beliefs. Surveys were conducted before and after the debates to assess changes in student opinions on the viability of different energy types. Post-debate surveys revealed significant shifts in perception, such as a 0.8-point increase in favourability towards tidal energy in the 2023–2024 cohort. Additionally, 88 % of students reported finding the debates engaging, and 87 % felt the activity improved their understanding of energy topics. To further assess the development of critical skills fostered by the debates, a rubric was designed and applied by the professor, focusing on areas such as argument clarity, use of evidence, and teamwork. This rubric provided valuable insights into students' skill progression throughout the activity, offering an objective perspective on the effectiveness of debate-based learning without impacting students' final grades. Using critical debates in Chemical Engineering classes fosters argumentative skills and awareness of the importance of sustainable energy supplies. This method of education engages students in structured discussions, challenging their beliefs and promoting critical thinking about future energy solutions. #EduInnovation • Assessed the effectiveness of in-class debates on critical thinking in students. • Structured debates on sustainable energy were implemented in a third-year course. • Surveys revealed improved ability to analyze and discuss complex energy issues. • In-class debates proved effective for developing critical thinking and collaboration. • Supported the integration of debate-based learning to promote sustainability goals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Education for Chemical Engineers
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ece.2025.03.002
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Education and Critical Thinking Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
35.70
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Energy under debate: Fostering critical thinking in chemical engineering through in-class debates

Diego Valor, Ignacio García-Casas, A. Montes, María del Mar Mesa
4 citations
Education for Chemical Engineers
Education and Critical Thinking Development
35.70
article

Energy under debate: Fostering critical thinking in chemical engineering through in-class debates

Diego Valor, Ignacio García-Casas, A. Montes, María del Mar Mesa
article en
4 citations

Abstract

This paper examines the use of in-class debates as a collaborative learning technique in the teaching of Chemical Engineering, as part of a third-year course in the Chemistry degree. "The aim is to evaluate its effectiveness in developing critical thinking and argumentative skills, while promoting awareness of sustainable energy aligned with the United Nations' Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 7, which aims to ensure access to affordable, reliable, sustainable, and modern energy for all (United Nations, 2015). Over two academic years (2022–2024), students participated in debates on various energy sources, including nuclear, wind, solar or tidal energy, among others. The debates encouraged students to engage with diverse perspectives, apply their theoretical knowledge, and defend positions contrary to their own beliefs. Surveys were conducted before and after the debates to assess changes in student opinions on the viability of different energy types. Post-debate surveys revealed significant shifts in perception, such as a 0.8-point increase in favourability towards tidal energy in the 2023–2024 cohort. Additionally, 88 % of students reported finding the debates engaging, and 87 % felt the activity improved their understanding of energy topics. To further assess the development of critical skills fostered by the debates, a rubric was designed and applied by the professor, focusing on areas such as argument clarity, use of evidence, and teamwork. This rubric provided valuable insights into students' skill progression throughout the activity, offering an objective perspective on the effectiveness of debate-based learning without impacting students' final grades. Using critical debates in Chemical Engineering classes fosters argumentative skills and awareness of the importance of sustainable energy supplies. This method of education engages students in structured discussions, challenging their beliefs and promoting critical thinking about future energy solutions. #EduInnovation • Assessed the effectiveness of in-class debates on critical thinking in students. • Structured debates on sustainable energy were implemented in a third-year course. • Surveys revealed improved ability to analyze and discuss complex energy issues. • In-class debates proved effective for developing critical thinking and collaboration. • Supported the integration of debate-based learning to promote sustainability goals.

Education for Chemical EngineersVol. 51
Universidad de Cádiz (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Education and Critical Thinking Development
35.70
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.