Geometry‐Based Scan Curve Analysis: Rapid Method for the Evaluation of Scan Strategies in Powder Bed Fusion

It is well known that scan strategies have an essential role in powder bed fusion (PBF). For the comparison of different scan strategies, however, it is usually necessary to evaluate manufactured samples or run simulations. Given the typically lengthy nature of these processes, this study focuses on finding a rapid preprocess evaluation method for scan strategies using geometrical approaches: line buffer‐based calculations and a point density field. Both approaches only depend on the geometry of the scan strategy. While these calculations should apply to most PBF processes, this study uses the evaluation methods to predict the differences that four unique scanning strategies have in PBF of polymers using an near‐infrared laser source. Polyamid 12 powder with Lanthanum hexaboride nanoparticles and a commercial black‐dyed Polyamid 12 powder are used for processing. The calculation of the line buffer‐based surface energies of these scanning strategies correctly predicted the sequence in which the scanning curve appeared to have received the laser energy. Moreover, the defects observed in the manufactured samples appear to be related to the variation in point density of the scanning strategies. These promising results are the first step towards new preprocess evaluation methods, leading to improved predictability of different scan strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advanced Engineering Materials
Published
2025-04-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.202402929
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.71

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Geometry‐Based Scan Curve Analysis: Rapid Method for the Evaluation of Scan Strategies in Powder Bed Fusion

Stephan Barcikowski, Michael Willeke, Sebastian‐Paul Kopp, Michael Schmidt et al.
1 citations
Advanced Engineering Materials
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
0.71
article

Geometry‐Based Scan Curve Analysis: Rapid Method for the Evaluation of Scan Strategies in Powder Bed Fusion

Stephan Barcikowski, Michael Willeke, Sebastian‐Paul Kopp, Michael Schmidt, Anna Rosa Ziefuß, Nadine Stratmann, Matthias Gehring, Simon Leupold, Alexander Sommereyns, Parmar Yankit Dineshbhai
article en
1 citations

Abstract

It is well known that scan strategies have an essential role in powder bed fusion (PBF). For the comparison of different scan strategies, however, it is usually necessary to evaluate manufactured samples or run simulations. Given the typically lengthy nature of these processes, this study focuses on finding a rapid preprocess evaluation method for scan strategies using geometrical approaches: line buffer‐based calculations and a point density field. Both approaches only depend on the geometry of the scan strategy. While these calculations should apply to most PBF processes, this study uses the evaluation methods to predict the differences that four unique scanning strategies have in PBF of polymers using an near‐infrared laser source. Polyamid 12 powder with Lanthanum hexaboride nanoparticles and a commercial black‐dyed Polyamid 12 powder are used for processing. The calculation of the line buffer‐based surface energies of these scanning strategies correctly predicted the sequence in which the scanning curve appeared to have received the laser energy. Moreover, the defects observed in the manufactured samples appear to be related to the variation in point density of the scanning strategies. These promising results are the first step towards new preprocess evaluation methods, leading to improved predictability of different scan strategies.

Advanced Engineering MaterialsVol. 27(14)
Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (DE), University of Duisburg-Essen (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Erlangen Graduate School of Advanced Optical Technologies, Evonik Industries, Bayerisches Staatsministerium für Wissenschaft und Kunst
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
0.71
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.