Croatia and the strategy of (extended) deterrence in the context of the Ukraine conflict: Normative foundations and practical challenges

This paper examines Croatia's involvement in (extended) deterrence strategy as a critical component of NATO's collective defense strategy and its broader implications for regional stability, particularly in bilateral relations with Serbia. The research aims to analyze how Croatia's NATO membership has influenced its strategic positioning and contributed to the development of its security policies. It also explores the impact of the Ukraine conflict on NATO's strategic priorities and Croatia's alignment with these objectives. The research draws on a comparative analysis of Croatia's national security and defense strategies from 2002 to 2017, reflecting a transition shaped by NATO and EU integration. The study demonstrates how Croatia has integrated its national defense strategy with broader Euro-Atlantic frameworks. Special attention is given to Croatia's contributions to NATO missions and its political and logistical support for Ukraine. These engagements illustrate Croatia's commitment to NATO's objectives, including bolstering collective security and deterrence measures against potential threats, notably from Russia. This includes military assistance amounting to €181 million and alignment with EU sanctions against Russia. Despite these efforts, internal political disagreements, such as debates over training Ukrainian forces, reveal Croatia's challenges in balancing national interests with alliance obligations. The research highlights the exacerbation of the "security dilemma" between Croatia and Serbia, driven by differing security policies and the broader geopolitical consequences of the Ukraine conflict. Fueled by the Ukraine conflict, this dilemma is analyzed through the lens of arms races, strategic doctrines, and contrasting geopolitical alignments. The paper suggests that these dynamics aggravate existing mistrust and challenge regional stability in the Balkans. Croatia's NATO-driven deterrence strategy contrasts sharply with Serbia's military neutrality and strategic partnership with Russia, intensifying regional tensions and arms races. These dynamics underline the risk of destabilization in the Balkans if such tensions are not managed through sustained diplomatic efforts. The research offers a critical perspective on how national security strategies interact with multilateral policies, providing new insights into the regional consequences of global strategies like NATO's deterrence framework. It underscores the need for Croatia and its neighbors to prioritize long-term strategic goals and regional cooperation to mitigate the risks posed by evolving security challenges. The findings emphasize the need for balanced approaches that reconcile national interests with allied obligations to ensure sustainable regional stability.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Nacionalni interes
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5937/nint50-55746
Primary Topic
European and Russian Geopolitical Military Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Croatia and the strategy of (extended) deterrence in the context of the Ukraine conflict: Normative foundations and practical challenges

Isidora Pop-Lazić
Nacionalni interes
European and Russian Geopolitical Military Strategies
article

Croatia and the strategy of (extended) deterrence in the context of the Ukraine conflict: Normative foundations and practical challenges

Isidora Pop-Lazić
article en

Abstract

This paper examines Croatia's involvement in (extended) deterrence strategy as a critical component of NATO's collective defense strategy and its broader implications for regional stability, particularly in bilateral relations with Serbia. The research aims to analyze how Croatia's NATO membership has influenced its strategic positioning and contributed to the development of its security policies. It also explores the impact of the Ukraine conflict on NATO's strategic priorities and Croatia's alignment with these objectives. The research draws on a comparative analysis of Croatia's national security and defense strategies from 2002 to 2017, reflecting a transition shaped by NATO and EU integration. The study demonstrates how Croatia has integrated its national defense strategy with broader Euro-Atlantic frameworks. Special attention is given to Croatia's contributions to NATO missions and its political and logistical support for Ukraine. These engagements illustrate Croatia's commitment to NATO's objectives, including bolstering collective security and deterrence measures against potential threats, notably from Russia. This includes military assistance amounting to €181 million and alignment with EU sanctions against Russia. Despite these efforts, internal political disagreements, such as debates over training Ukrainian forces, reveal Croatia's challenges in balancing national interests with alliance obligations. The research highlights the exacerbation of the "security dilemma" between Croatia and Serbia, driven by differing security policies and the broader geopolitical consequences of the Ukraine conflict. Fueled by the Ukraine conflict, this dilemma is analyzed through the lens of arms races, strategic doctrines, and contrasting geopolitical alignments. The paper suggests that these dynamics aggravate existing mistrust and challenge regional stability in the Balkans. Croatia's NATO-driven deterrence strategy contrasts sharply with Serbia's military neutrality and strategic partnership with Russia, intensifying regional tensions and arms races. These dynamics underline the risk of destabilization in the Balkans if such tensions are not managed through sustained diplomatic efforts. The research offers a critical perspective on how national security strategies interact with multilateral policies, providing new insights into the regional consequences of global strategies like NATO's deterrence framework. It underscores the need for Croatia and its neighbors to prioritize long-term strategic goals and regional cooperation to mitigate the risks posed by evolving security challenges. The findings emphasize the need for balanced approaches that reconcile national interests with allied obligations to ensure sustainable regional stability.

Nacionalni interesVol. 50(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
European and Russian Geopolitical Military Strategies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.