Mood Selection in the Old Northumbrian Gloss to Durham <scp>MS</scp> A.<scp>iv</scp>.19

Abstract The aim of this article is to examine the use of the subjunctive in the 10th‐century Old Northumbrian gloss to Durham MS A.iv.19. We assess whether there is evidence for a weakening of the indicative/subjunctive opposition, as has been argued for the earlier gloss to the Lindisfarne Gospels, which was the work of the same glossator, Aldred of Chester‐le‐Street. For this purpose, we analyse the subjunctive forms in both main and subordinate clauses in conjunction with their Latin lemmata, taking into account both their syntactic context and cotext. We also examine the factors that may have conditioned Aldred's selection of mood and, additionally, address instances in which his glosses appear to correct erroneous Latin lemmata. No evidence was found for the breakdown of the subjunctive category in Durham Collectar, which may be related to features of this text type. Our study also identifies corrections of erroneous Latin inflections in the text and, conversely, potential misrecognition of the forms of the relevant Latin lemmata.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transactions of the Philological Society
Published
2025-04-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-968x.12314
Primary Topic
Medieval Literature and History
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mood Selection in the Old Northumbrian Gloss to Durham MS A.iv.19

Christopher Langmuir, Julia Fernández Cuesta
Transactions of the Philological Society
Medieval Literature and History
article

Mood Selection in the Old Northumbrian Gloss to Durham MS A.iv.19

Christopher Langmuir, Julia Fernández Cuesta
article en

Abstract

Abstract The aim of this article is to examine the use of the subjunctive in the 10th‐century Old Northumbrian gloss to Durham MS A.iv.19. We assess whether there is evidence for a weakening of the indicative/subjunctive opposition, as has been argued for the earlier gloss to the Lindisfarne Gospels, which was the work of the same glossator, Aldred of Chester‐le‐Street. For this purpose, we analyse the subjunctive forms in both main and subordinate clauses in conjunction with their Latin lemmata, taking into account both their syntactic context and cotext. We also examine the factors that may have conditioned Aldred's selection of mood and, additionally, address instances in which his glosses appear to correct erroneous Latin lemmata. No evidence was found for the breakdown of the subjunctive category in Durham Collectar, which may be related to features of this text type. Our study also identifies corrections of erroneous Latin inflections in the text and, conversely, potential misrecognition of the forms of the relevant Latin lemmata.

Transactions of the Philological SocietyVol. 123(2)
Universidad de Sevilla (ES)
Secretaría de Estado de Investigacion, Desarrollo e Innovacion
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Medieval Literature and History
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.