Numerosity Perception and Perceptual Load: Exploring Sex Differences Through Eye-Tracking

This study investigates sex differences in numerosity perception and visuospatial abilities in adults using eye-tracking methodology. We report the results of a controlled dual-task experiment that assessed the participants' visuospatial and numerosity estimation abilities. We did not observe sex differences in reaction times and accuracy. However, we found that females consistently underestimated numerosity. This underestimation correlated with higher perceptual load in females, as evidenced by shorter fixation durations and increased fixation rates. These findings suggest that perceptual load, rather than visual or spatial abilities, significantly influences numerosity estimation. Our study contributes novel insights into sex differences in both numerosity estimation and visuospatial abilities. These results provide a foundation for future research on numerosity perception across various populations and contexts, with implications for educational strategies and cognitive training programs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Eye Movement Research
Published
2025-04-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jemr18020009
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.26
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Numerosity Perception and Perceptual Load: Exploring Sex Differences Through Eye-Tracking

Anssi Öörni, Julia Bend
2 citations
Journal of Eye Movement Research
Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
5.26
article

Numerosity Perception and Perceptual Load: Exploring Sex Differences Through Eye-Tracking

Anssi Öörni, Julia Bend
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This study investigates sex differences in numerosity perception and visuospatial abilities in adults using eye-tracking methodology. We report the results of a controlled dual-task experiment that assessed the participants' visuospatial and numerosity estimation abilities. We did not observe sex differences in reaction times and accuracy. However, we found that females consistently underestimated numerosity. This underestimation correlated with higher perceptual load in females, as evidenced by shorter fixation durations and increased fixation rates. These findings suggest that perceptual load, rather than visual or spatial abilities, significantly influences numerosity estimation. Our study contributes novel insights into sex differences in both numerosity estimation and visuospatial abilities. These results provide a foundation for future research on numerosity perception across various populations and contexts, with implications for educational strategies and cognitive training programs.

Journal of Eye Movement ResearchVol. 18(2)
Åbo Akademi University (FI)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
5.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Numerosity Perception and Perceptual Load: Exploring Sex Differences Through Eye-Tracking — Anssi Öörni, Julia Bend · Journal of Eye Movement Research (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS