Evaluation of correctness and reliability of GPT, Bard, and Bing chatbots’ responses in basic life support scenarios

Timely recognition and initiation of basic life support (BLS) before emergency medical services arrive significantly improve survival rates and neurological outcomes. In an era where health information-seeking behaviors have shifted toward online sources, chatbots powered by generative artificial intelligence (AI) are emerging as potential tools for providing immediate health-related guidance. This study investigates the reliability of AI chatbots, specifically GPT-3.5, GPT-4, Bard, and Bing, in responding to BLS scenarios. A cross-sectional study was conducted using six scenarios adapted from the BLS. Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) by United Medical Education. These scenarios covering adult, pediatric, and infant emergencies, were presented to each chatbot on two occasions, one week apart. Responses were evaluated by a board-certified emergency medicine professor from Tehran University of Medical Sciences, using a checklist based on BLS-OSCE standards. Correctness was assessed, and reliability was measured using Cohen's kappa coefficient. GPT-4 demonstrated the highest correctness in adult scenarios (85% correct responses), while Bard showed 60% correctness. GPT-3.5 and Bing performed poorly across all scenarios. Bard achieved a correctness rate of 52.17% in pediatric scenarios, but all chatbots scored below 44% in infant scenarios. Cohen's kappa indicated substantial reliability for GPT-4 (k = 0.649) and GPT-3.5 (k = 0.645), moderate reliability for Bing (k = 0.503), and fair reliability for Bard (k = 0.357). While GPT-4 showed the highest correctness and reliability in adult BLS situations, all tested chatbots struggled significantly in pediatric and infant cases. Furthermore, none of the chatbots consistently adhered to BLS guidelines, raising concerns about their potential use in real-life emergencies. Based on these findings, AI chatbots in their current form can only be relied upon to guide bystanders through life-saving procedures with human supervision.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-04-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-82948-w
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
18.03
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of correctness and reliability of GPT, Bard, and Bing chatbots’ responses in basic life support scenarios

Mohammad Eftekhari, Mehrnoosh Aligholi-Zahraie, Saeed Aqavil-Jahromi, Hamideh Akbari
8 citations
Scientific Reports
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
18.03
article

Evaluation of correctness and reliability of GPT, Bard, and Bing chatbots’ responses in basic life support scenarios

Mohammad Eftekhari, Mehrnoosh Aligholi-Zahraie, Saeed Aqavil-Jahromi, Hamideh Akbari
article en
8 citations

Abstract

Timely recognition and initiation of basic life support (BLS) before emergency medical services arrive significantly improve survival rates and neurological outcomes. In an era where health information-seeking behaviors have shifted toward online sources, chatbots powered by generative artificial intelligence (AI) are emerging as potential tools for providing immediate health-related guidance. This study investigates the reliability of AI chatbots, specifically GPT-3.5, GPT-4, Bard, and Bing, in responding to BLS scenarios. A cross-sectional study was conducted using six scenarios adapted from the BLS. Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) by United Medical Education. These scenarios covering adult, pediatric, and infant emergencies, were presented to each chatbot on two occasions, one week apart. Responses were evaluated by a board-certified emergency medicine professor from Tehran University of Medical Sciences, using a checklist based on BLS-OSCE standards. Correctness was assessed, and reliability was measured using Cohen's kappa coefficient. GPT-4 demonstrated the highest correctness in adult scenarios (85% correct responses), while Bard showed 60% correctness. GPT-3.5 and Bing performed poorly across all scenarios. Bard achieved a correctness rate of 52.17% in pediatric scenarios, but all chatbots scored below 44% in infant scenarios. Cohen's kappa indicated substantial reliability for GPT-4 (k = 0.649) and GPT-3.5 (k = 0.645), moderate reliability for Bing (k = 0.503), and fair reliability for Bard (k = 0.357). While GPT-4 showed the highest correctness and reliability in adult BLS situations, all tested chatbots struggled significantly in pediatric and infant cases. Furthermore, none of the chatbots consistently adhered to BLS guidelines, raising concerns about their potential use in real-life emergencies. Based on these findings, AI chatbots in their current form can only be relied upon to guide bystanders through life-saving procedures with human supervision.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Imam Khomeini Hospital (IR), Tehran University of Medical Sciences (IR)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
18.03
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.