Educational disparities in 20-year trajectories of psychological well-being in a national sample

Long-term trajectories of psychological well-being were investigated using data from a national longitudinal study known as MIDUS (Midlife in the U.S.) The central question was whether educational status and age were associated with gains, losses, or persistent disadvantage on widely studied dimensions of eudaimonic well-being such as personal growth, purpose in life, and self-acceptance. Findings from a sample of adults (N = 6908), aged 25-74 at baseline, showed primarily loss across the 20-year period (1995-2015). Those with a high school education or less showed persistently lower levels of six distinct aspects of well-being compared to those with more education across time. In addition, purpose in life declined for all age groups. Losses over time for autonomy, environmental mastery, and personal growth were steeper for the oldest age group (i.e., 61 years and older) compared to younger (i.e., 40 years and younger) and midlife (i.e., 41-60 years) adults, while losses for self-acceptance were steepest for young adults compared to the two older age groups. The role of structural inequalities in understanding variation in these well-being trajectories and their implications for future health are considered.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-04-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-95058-y
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.88

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Educational disparities in 20-year trajectories of psychological well-being in a national sample

Jennifer Morozink Boylan, Julie A. Kirsch, Carol D. Ryff, Jeong Ha Choi
2 citations
Scientific Reports
Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
4.88
article

Educational disparities in 20-year trajectories of psychological well-being in a national sample

Jennifer Morozink Boylan, Julie A. Kirsch, Carol D. Ryff, Jeong Ha Choi
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Long-term trajectories of psychological well-being were investigated using data from a national longitudinal study known as MIDUS (Midlife in the U.S.) The central question was whether educational status and age were associated with gains, losses, or persistent disadvantage on widely studied dimensions of eudaimonic well-being such as personal growth, purpose in life, and self-acceptance. Findings from a sample of adults (N = 6908), aged 25-74 at baseline, showed primarily loss across the 20-year period (1995-2015). Those with a high school education or less showed persistently lower levels of six distinct aspects of well-being compared to those with more education across time. In addition, purpose in life declined for all age groups. Losses over time for autonomy, environmental mastery, and personal growth were steeper for the oldest age group (i.e., 61 years and older) compared to younger (i.e., 40 years and younger) and midlife (i.e., 41-60 years) adults, while losses for self-acceptance were steepest for young adults compared to the two older age groups. The role of structural inequalities in understanding variation in these well-being trajectories and their implications for future health are considered.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), Georgia State University (US), Institute on Aging (US)
John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, National Institutes of Health
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
4.88
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.