Assessing methods in fusion and fitting for time series construction in remote sensing-based earth observations
This study evaluates the comparative performance of spatiotemporal fusion and time-series fitting methods for constructing high-spatiotemporal-resolution remote sensing time-series data. Due to in-class similarity of fusion methods and fitting methods, we employ the Fit-FC (Fitting, spatial Filtering, and residual Compensation) model as a representative fusion method and the linear harmonic fitting model as a representative fitting method. Both Fit-FC and the linear harmonic fitting are widely used for high-spatiotemporal-resolution time-series data construction, and we modify the original Fit-FC model to enable automatic time-series fusion. To ensure data representativeness, we use 3 years (2019–2021) of Harmonized Landsat and Sentinel-2 surface reflectance datasets and Terra MCD43A4 products. Eight experimental regions are selected worldwide to guarantee generalization of the comparative performance between fusion and fitting methods, covering diverse land-use types (cropland, developed land, forest, and grassland) and varying climatological conditions. Time-series of NDVI and surface reflectance are analyzed under both actual observations and simulated data-missing scenarios. The constructed time-series data reveals that (1) the modified Fit-FC and linear harmonic fitting model achieve excellent performance in constructing high-resolution time-series images; (2) the fusion method outperforms the fitting method in constructing time-series of NDVI and surface reflectance images in cropland-, forest-, and grassland-dominated regions; (3) both methods achieve comparable performance in developed-dominated regions; (4) the fusion method is more robust to missing data, and better captures abrupt phenological transitions under conditions of continuous missing data; (5) the fitting method is computationally more efficient, making it suitable for large-scale time-series image reconstruction. This study provides valuable insights for selecting optimal strategies to generate high-resolution time-series images across diverse application scenarios and lays a foundation for extensions to other vegetation indices or land surface variables.
Authors
- Pengcheng Guo (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0142-5716)
- Virgílio A. Bento (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9574-3090)
- Yelu Zeng (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4267-1841)
- Dalei Hao (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3497-9774)
- Qianfeng Wang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8460-6821)
- Huicong Jia (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0312-7376)
- Jia Tang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0002-7873-8868)
- Chen Yu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9675-8814)
Institutions
- University of Lisbon (PT)
- Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (US)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
- Hainan University (CN)
- Beijing Normal University (CN)
- Aerospace Information Research Institute (CN)
- China Agricultural University (CN)
- Renmin University of China (CN)
- Fuzhou University (CN)
Publication Details
- Journal
- GIScience & Remote Sensing
- Published
- 2025-04-04
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1080/15481603.2025.2486190
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Remote Sensing in Agriculture
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 1.72
Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China