Investigation in the CB1 and CB2 receptor binding profile and intrinsic activity of (−) and (+)-enantiomers of some naturally occurring phytocannabinoids or synthetic derivatives

Cannabidiol (CBD) and cannabidivarin (CBDV) have shown promising clinical efficacy for the management of epilepsy, and beneficial effects have been demonstrated for CBD in a diversity of other pathologies (pain, schizophrenia, Tourette syndrome, anxiety). However, the mechanism(s) involved are still largely elusive, as are the molecular target(s) involved. CBD and CBDV do not orthosterically bind the cannabinoid type-1 (CB 1 ) and type-2 (CB 2 ) receptors, showing only modest allosteric modulation of both end-points. CBD and CBDV are biosynthesized as optically highly pure (−)-enantiomers, and most bioactivity data refer to these forms. (+)-CBD and related analogues [(+)-cannabidiolic acid (CBDA), its esters, and (+)-CBDV] can be obtained by chemical synthesis, and we present evidence that the (+)- and (−)-enantiomers of CBD, CBDV and of a selection of derivatives of CBDA have distinct binding profiles and functional activity at the CB 1 /CB 2 receptors. Thus, with the single exception of the methyl ester of CBDA, all the (+)-enantiomers showed higher affinities than the (−)-isomers for both receptors, in particular for the CB 2 receptors. The affinity of the (+)-enantiomers for both CB 1 and CB 2 receptors showed a marked dependence on the nature of the alkyl residue on the aromatic ring and the esterification pattern of CBDA. Potency was rarely in the low nM value for CB 1 , but generally so for CB 2 . Enantiomers showing low nM activity were further investigated for their intrinsic activity using GTPγS binding assays. This proved that (+)-CBD, (+)-CBDV and the methyl ester of (+)-CBDA are agonists at the CB 2 receptor, with the β-hydroxyethyl ester of (+)-CBDA being an inverse agonist, and its β-hydroxypentyl ester behaving as an agonist at CB 1 and an inverse agonist at CB 2 . Finally, we assayed in vitro the anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective properties of three compounds [(+)-CBD, (+)-CBDV and (+)-CBDA methyl ester] strongly activating CB 2 , showing their ability to reduce the production of proinflammatory factors and protecting neurons against their toxicity. Remarkably, these benefits were eliminated by the selective blockade of the CB 2 receptor, highlighting its role as a (+)-CBD target. In summary, our data show that remarkable differences between (−)- and (+)-enantiomers of CBD, CBDV and related compounds exist in terms of CB 1 /CB 2 receptor binding profile and intrinsic activity. The observation that the natural (−)-enantiomers do not bind CB 2 receptors suggests that their effects are associated with different targets.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry Reports
Published
2025-04-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmcr.2025.100262
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.39
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Investigation in the CB1 and CB2 receptor binding profile and intrinsic activity of (−) and (+)-enantiomers of some naturally occurring phytocannabinoids or synthetic derivatives

Paula Morales, Diego Caprioglio, Concepción García, Nadine Jagerovic et al.
1 citations
European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry Reports
Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
1.39
article

Investigation in the CB1 and CB2 receptor binding profile and intrinsic activity of (−) and (+)-enantiomers of some naturally occurring phytocannabinoids or synthetic derivatives

Paula Morales, Diego Caprioglio, Concepción García, Nadine Jagerovic, Claudia Gonzalo‐Consuegra, María Gómez‐Cañas, Eduardo Muñóz, Marcus R. Goetz, Giovanni Appendino, Mathias Winkler, Bernd L. Fiebich, Javier Fernández‐Ruíz, Joerg T. Fischer, Santiago Rodríguez-Carreiro, Francesca Lubrini
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Cannabidiol (CBD) and cannabidivarin (CBDV) have shown promising clinical efficacy for the management of epilepsy, and beneficial effects have been demonstrated for CBD in a diversity of other pathologies (pain, schizophrenia, Tourette syndrome, anxiety). However, the mechanism(s) involved are still largely elusive, as are the molecular target(s) involved. CBD and CBDV do not orthosterically bind the cannabinoid type-1 (CB 1 ) and type-2 (CB 2 ) receptors, showing only modest allosteric modulation of both end-points. CBD and CBDV are biosynthesized as optically highly pure (−)-enantiomers, and most bioactivity data refer to these forms. (+)-CBD and related analogues [(+)-cannabidiolic acid (CBDA), its esters, and (+)-CBDV] can be obtained by chemical synthesis, and we present evidence that the (+)- and (−)-enantiomers of CBD, CBDV and of a selection of derivatives of CBDA have distinct binding profiles and functional activity at the CB 1 /CB 2 receptors. Thus, with the single exception of the methyl ester of CBDA, all the (+)-enantiomers showed higher affinities than the (−)-isomers for both receptors, in particular for the CB 2 receptors. The affinity of the (+)-enantiomers for both CB 1 and CB 2 receptors showed a marked dependence on the nature of the alkyl residue on the aromatic ring and the esterification pattern of CBDA. Potency was rarely in the low nM value for CB 1 , but generally so for CB 2 . Enantiomers showing low nM activity were further investigated for their intrinsic activity using GTPγS binding assays. This proved that (+)-CBD, (+)-CBDV and the methyl ester of (+)-CBDA are agonists at the CB 2 receptor, with the β-hydroxyethyl ester of (+)-CBDA being an inverse agonist, and its β-hydroxypentyl ester behaving as an agonist at CB 1 and an inverse agonist at CB 2 . Finally, we assayed in vitro the anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective properties of three compounds [(+)-CBD, (+)-CBDV and (+)-CBDA methyl ester] strongly activating CB 2 , showing their ability to reduce the production of proinflammatory factors and protecting neurons against their toxicity. Remarkably, these benefits were eliminated by the selective blockade of the CB 2 receptor, highlighting its role as a (+)-CBD target. In summary, our data show that remarkable differences between (−)- and (+)-enantiomers of CBD, CBDV and related compounds exist in terms of CB 1 /CB 2 receptor binding profile and intrinsic activity. The observation that the natural (−)-enantiomers do not bind CB 2 receptors suggests that their effects are associated with different targets.

European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry ReportsVol. 14
Universidad Complutense de Madrid (ES), Università degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale “Amedeo Avogadro” (IT), Biomedical Research Networking Center on Neurodegenerative Diseases (ES), Instituto Maimónides de Investigación Biomédica de Córdoba (ES), Instituto de Química Médica (ES), Hospital Universitario Reina Sofía (ES), Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria (ES), University of Córdoba (ES), Symrise (Germany) (DE)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
1.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.