Global utilization of artificial intelligence in the diagnosis and management of voice disorders over the past five years

Abstract Objective This review evaluates the worldwide use of artificial intelligence (AI) for the diagnosis and treatment of voice disorders. Methods An electronic search was completed in Embase, Pubmed, Ovid MEDLINE, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Web of Science. Studies in English from 2019 to 2024 evaluating the use of AI in detection and management of voice disorders were included. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses guidelines were followed. Results Eighty‐one studies were recognized. Thirty‐three studies were chosen and screened for quality assessment. Of these, 16 studies used AI to determine normal versus pathological voice. The convolutional neural network (CNN) was the most employed algorithm among all machine learning algorithms. Conclusion This review revealed significant interest worldwide in utilizing AI in detection of voice disorders. Gaps included the use of limited, inconsistent data sets, lack of validation, and emphasis on detection rather than treatment of the voice disorder. These are areas of opportunity for AI techniques to improved diagnostic accuracy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Eye & ENT Research
Published
2025-04-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/eer3.70006
Primary Topic
Voice and Speech Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Global utilization of artificial intelligence in the diagnosis and management of voice disorders over the past five years

Amy L. Rutt, Amna Suleman
Eye & ENT Research
Voice and Speech Disorders
article

Global utilization of artificial intelligence in the diagnosis and management of voice disorders over the past five years

Amy L. Rutt, Amna Suleman
article en

Abstract

Abstract Objective This review evaluates the worldwide use of artificial intelligence (AI) for the diagnosis and treatment of voice disorders. Methods An electronic search was completed in Embase, Pubmed, Ovid MEDLINE, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Web of Science. Studies in English from 2019 to 2024 evaluating the use of AI in detection and management of voice disorders were included. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses guidelines were followed. Results Eighty‐one studies were recognized. Thirty‐three studies were chosen and screened for quality assessment. Of these, 16 studies used AI to determine normal versus pathological voice. The convolutional neural network (CNN) was the most employed algorithm among all machine learning algorithms. Conclusion This review revealed significant interest worldwide in utilizing AI in detection of voice disorders. Gaps included the use of limited, inconsistent data sets, lack of validation, and emphasis on detection rather than treatment of the voice disorder. These are areas of opportunity for AI techniques to improved diagnostic accuracy.

Eye & ENT ResearchVol. 2(2)
Jacksonville College (US), Mayo Clinic in Florida (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Voice and Speech Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Global utilization of artificial intelligence in the diagnosis and management of voice disorders over the past five years — Amy L. Rutt, Amna Suleman · Eye & ENT Research (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS