Unequal burdens and shared fates: rethinking climate justice through reparative action and global solidarity

In this perspective paper, I discuss the troubling inequalities driving our climate crisis, where wealthier nations profit most while poorer communities face the harshest consequences. My observations of the media coverage surrounding the 2024 Climate Conference in Baku reinforced my sense that even well-intentioned initiatives such as the Sustainable Development Goals and the Paris Agreement often become entangled in politics and corporate interests. Drawing on multiple insights from environmental sociology – including Beck’s (World) Risk Society, Moore’s concept of the Capitalocene, and Fraser’s analysis of expropriation – I argue that minor reforms are not enough; we need fundamental changes to the economic structures fuelling these inequalities. I advocate for reparative justice, a shift away from relentless economic growth, and genuine global solidarity. In my view, climate justice is not optional – it is essential. It requires urgent, transformative action to safeguard people, ecosystems, and our planet’s future.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Sociology
Published
2025-04-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/23251042.2025.2487964
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Climate Change, Adaptation, Migration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unequal burdens and shared fates: rethinking climate justice through reparative action and global solidarity

Md Nazmul Hasan
1 citations
Environmental Sociology
Climate Change, Adaptation, Migration
4.20
article

Unequal burdens and shared fates: rethinking climate justice through reparative action and global solidarity

Md Nazmul Hasan
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In this perspective paper, I discuss the troubling inequalities driving our climate crisis, where wealthier nations profit most while poorer communities face the harshest consequences. My observations of the media coverage surrounding the 2024 Climate Conference in Baku reinforced my sense that even well-intentioned initiatives such as the Sustainable Development Goals and the Paris Agreement often become entangled in politics and corporate interests. Drawing on multiple insights from environmental sociology – including Beck’s (World) Risk Society, Moore’s concept of the Capitalocene, and Fraser’s analysis of expropriation – I argue that minor reforms are not enough; we need fundamental changes to the economic structures fuelling these inequalities. I advocate for reparative justice, a shift away from relentless economic growth, and genuine global solidarity. In my view, climate justice is not optional – it is essential. It requires urgent, transformative action to safeguard people, ecosystems, and our planet’s future.

Environmental SociologyVol. 11(3)
Nottingham Trent University (GB)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Climate Change, Adaptation, Migration
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.