Global Value Chains, Foreign Direct Investment, and Industrial Pollution Intensity in China

ABSTRACT As the search for resilience alters global value chains (GVCs), many developing countries hope to benefit from GVC participation. China's heavy reliance on GVC trade and its high pollution levels suggest that such benefits may come at the cost of the environment. Yet direct evidence on environmental effects from GVCs is limited. This paper proposes that GVCs and foreign investment can reduce pollution intensity through three channels: greener technologies, a wider range of local tasks, and learning. Drawing on the Copeland–Taylor trade and pollution model and the Feenstra–Hanson outsourcing model, we demonstrate this possibility. We then test this hypothesis using Chinese industrial SO 2 and chemical oxygen demand emissions data. We develop two measures of the range of GVC tasks: a variant of the export extensive margin, and an adaptation of firm import and export upstreamness. Results suggest that GVC participation reduced industrial emissions intensity in China through all three channels.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Review of International Economics
Published
2025-04-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/roie.12798
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Global trade and economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.17

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Global Value Chains, Foreign Direct Investment, and Industrial Pollution Intensity in China

Judith M. Dean, Mary E. Lovely
2 citations
Review of International Economics
Global trade and economics
6.17
article

Global Value Chains, Foreign Direct Investment, and Industrial Pollution Intensity in China

Judith M. Dean, Mary E. Lovely
article en
2 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT As the search for resilience alters global value chains (GVCs), many developing countries hope to benefit from GVC participation. China's heavy reliance on GVC trade and its high pollution levels suggest that such benefits may come at the cost of the environment. Yet direct evidence on environmental effects from GVCs is limited. This paper proposes that GVCs and foreign investment can reduce pollution intensity through three channels: greener technologies, a wider range of local tasks, and learning. Drawing on the Copeland–Taylor trade and pollution model and the Feenstra–Hanson outsourcing model, we demonstrate this possibility. We then test this hypothesis using Chinese industrial SO 2 and chemical oxygen demand emissions data. We develop two measures of the range of GVC tasks: a variant of the export extensive margin, and an adaptation of firm import and export upstreamness. Results suggest that GVC participation reduced industrial emissions intensity in China through all three channels.

Review of International EconomicsVol. 33(3)
Peterson Institute for International Economics (US), Brandeis University (US)
Brandeis University, University of Notre Dame
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Global trade and economics
6.17
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.