What is empathy for laypeople? – A replication study of Hall, Schwartz, and Duong (2021)

To understand how laypeople define empathy, Hall, Schwartz, and Duong (2021) asked U.S. participants to rate how well items from various empathy measures matched their own definitions. The current paper (<i>N</i> = 549) is a replication of Hall, Schwartz, and Duong (2021, Study 2) using a highly similar study procedure, with a small extension consisting of items from an emotional contagion scale. We conducted a multi-group CFA to test the replicability of Hall et al.'s model, but the factor structure was not replicated. As an extension, we conducted an exploratory graph analysis (EGA), that revealed a similar factor structure, though some items were discarded due to poor fit. Additionally, the ranking of the items (i.e. what the participants saw as closest to their definition of empathy) shows the same pattern as in the original study. We consider this to be a successful partial replication of Hall et al.'s (2021) findings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Social Psychology
Published
2025-04-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2025.2482014
Primary Topic
Empathy and Medical Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What is empathy for laypeople? – A replication study of Hall, Schwartz, and Duong (2021)

Magnus H. Blystad, Johanna K. Blomster Lyshol, Rafael Valdece Sousa Bastos, Peder Mortvedt Isager
The Journal of Social Psychology
Empathy and Medical Education
article

What is empathy for laypeople? – A replication study of Hall, Schwartz, and Duong (2021)

Magnus H. Blystad, Johanna K. Blomster Lyshol, Rafael Valdece Sousa Bastos, Peder Mortvedt Isager
article en

Abstract

To understand how laypeople define empathy, Hall, Schwartz, and Duong (2021) asked U.S. participants to rate how well items from various empathy measures matched their own definitions. The current paper (<i>N</i> = 549) is a replication of Hall, Schwartz, and Duong (2021, Study 2) using a highly similar study procedure, with a small extension consisting of items from an emotional contagion scale. We conducted a multi-group CFA to test the replicability of Hall et al.'s model, but the factor structure was not replicated. As an extension, we conducted an exploratory graph analysis (EGA), that revealed a similar factor structure, though some items were discarded due to poor fit. Additionally, the ranking of the items (i.e. what the participants saw as closest to their definition of empathy) shows the same pattern as in the original study. We consider this to be a successful partial replication of Hall et al.'s (2021) findings.

The Journal of Social Psychology
OsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University (NO), Universidade São Francisco (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Empathy and Medical Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

What is empathy for laypeople? – A replication study of Hall, Schwartz, and Duong (2021) — Magnus H. Blystad, Johanna K. Blomster Lyshol, et al. · The Journal of Social Psychology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS