Neurocognitive mechanisms underlying action tool knowledge tasks: specificity of tool-tool compared to hand-tool compatibility tasks

Action tool knowledge can be assessed mainly with two kinds of tasks: tool-tool and hand-tool compatibility tasks. While these tasks are used to assess action tool knowledge, recent data showed striking dissociations between these tasks in brain-damaged patients. In this study, we explored the neuropsychological dissociations (Experiment 1; 60 brain-damaged patients) and the potential cognitive mechanisms engaged during these two tasks (Experiment 2; 52 healthy participants). Finally, we also reanalyzed fMRI data to investigate the neural bases engaged in tool-tool and hand-tool compatibility tasks (Experiment 3; 34 healthy participants). The three experiments provide convergent arguments by showing that both tasks share common core computations supported by a left-lateralized brain network, but hand-tool compatibility task engages regions outside of this brain network and is explained by visual imagery while tool-tool task is rather explained by motor imagery. Our results shed a new light on action tool knowledge tasks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Communications Biology
Published
2025-04-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-025-07923-1
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Action Observation and Synchronization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.88

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Neurocognitive mechanisms underlying action tool knowledge tasks: specificity of tool-tool compared to hand-tool compatibility tasks

Gautier Clément, Éloi Magnin, Julie Martin, Elisabeth Medeiros de Bustos et al.
2 citations
Communications Biology
Action Observation and Synchronization
4.88
article

Neurocognitive mechanisms underlying action tool knowledge tasks: specificity of tool-tool compared to hand-tool compatibility tasks

Gautier Clément, Éloi Magnin, Julie Martin, Elisabeth Medeiros de Bustos, Mathieu Lesourd, François Osiurak, Guillaume Fargeix, Thierry Moulin, Margolise Laroze, Sébastien Hague
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Action tool knowledge can be assessed mainly with two kinds of tasks: tool-tool and hand-tool compatibility tasks. While these tasks are used to assess action tool knowledge, recent data showed striking dissociations between these tasks in brain-damaged patients. In this study, we explored the neuropsychological dissociations (Experiment 1; 60 brain-damaged patients) and the potential cognitive mechanisms engaged during these two tasks (Experiment 2; 52 healthy participants). Finally, we also reanalyzed fMRI data to investigate the neural bases engaged in tool-tool and hand-tool compatibility tasks (Experiment 3; 34 healthy participants). The three experiments provide convergent arguments by showing that both tasks share common core computations supported by a left-lateralized brain network, but hand-tool compatibility task engages regions outside of this brain network and is explained by visual imagery while tool-tool task is rather explained by motor imagery. Our results shed a new light on action tool knowledge tasks.

Communications BiologyVol. 8(1)
Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 (FR), Inserm (FR), Institut Universitaire de France (FR), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besançon (FR), Laboratoire d’Étude des Mécanismes Cognitifs (FR), Maison des Sciences sociales et des Humanités Ange Guépin (FR), Université Marie et Louis Pasteur (FR), Université de Franche-Comté (FR)
Agence Nationale de la Recherche
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Action Observation and Synchronization
4.88
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.