Beyond Eurocentrism: Globalising and Decentring Research on Micro-Regional Cross-Border Cooperation

Research on cross-border micro-regionalism has proliferated in the last three decades. Much of this research is undertheorized and Eurocentric in outlook. Addressing this problem, our article follows calls to establish a Global International Relations research perspective that also incorporates non-Western cultural traditions and historical trajectories in theory building. We demonstrate that Hooghe and Marks's multi-level governance framework, while widely regarded as the dominant theoretical approach to studying cross-border cooperation (CBC) in Western Europe, proves significantly less applicable when extended beyond the European context. We argue that in combination with Comparative Area Studies approaches, reconciling cognitive and material perspectives may better accommodate non-Western CBC and identify Analytic Eclecticism and Practice Theory as promising avenues for a global, but at the same time decentred, theory-building on CBC. Methodologically, we opt for inductive and abductive qualitative approaches and Qualitative Comparative Analysis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geopolitics
Published
2025-04-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2025.2476970
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Cross-Border Cooperation and Integration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond Eurocentrism: Globalising and Decentring Research on Micro-Regional Cross-Border Cooperation

Jürgen Rüland, Elisabetta Nadalutti
1 citations
Geopolitics
Cross-Border Cooperation and Integration
8.52
article

Beyond Eurocentrism: Globalising and Decentring Research on Micro-Regional Cross-Border Cooperation

Jürgen Rüland, Elisabetta Nadalutti
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Research on cross-border micro-regionalism has proliferated in the last three decades. Much of this research is undertheorized and Eurocentric in outlook. Addressing this problem, our article follows calls to establish a Global International Relations research perspective that also incorporates non-Western cultural traditions and historical trajectories in theory building. We demonstrate that Hooghe and Marks's multi-level governance framework, while widely regarded as the dominant theoretical approach to studying cross-border cooperation (CBC) in Western Europe, proves significantly less applicable when extended beyond the European context. We argue that in combination with Comparative Area Studies approaches, reconciling cognitive and material perspectives may better accommodate non-Western CBC and identify Analytic Eclecticism and Practice Theory as promising avenues for a global, but at the same time decentred, theory-building on CBC. Methodologically, we opt for inductive and abductive qualitative approaches and Qualitative Comparative Analysis.

GeopoliticsVol. 30(5)
University of Freiburg (DE)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Cross-Border Cooperation and Integration
8.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Beyond Eurocentrism: Globalising and Decentring Research on Micro-Regional Cross-Border Cooperation — Jürgen Rüland, Elisabetta Nadalutti · Geopolitics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS