Field‐assisted processing of Ce–zirconolite ceramics for nuclear applications

Abstract Conventional, flash, and hybrid sintering (unique combination of conventional and microwave heating) experiments were performed on 10% Ce‐doped zirconolite samples and the results were compared. Ce–zirconolite was prepared using reactive, pressure‐less, field‐assisted hybrid processing directly from the precursor made using commercial chemical agents, viz., CaTiO 3 , ZrO 2 , TiO 2 , and CeO 2 at 1350°C/2 h. For comparison, Ce–zirconolite ceramics were produced by the conventional synthesis at 1350°C/72 h and then sintering at 1450°C/10 h based on a literature methodology. The Ce–zirconolite samples were also flash sintered for the first time at 1100°C in just 5 min with the application of an AC field to ∼98% density with a finer grain size. A novel reactive flash synthesis procedure of zirconolite precursors with subsequent flash sintering was also explored. The flash process for both synthesis/sintering needs only ∼15% of the energy (85% savings) and hybrid method requires ∼ 33% (67% savings) of the total energy, respectively, when compared to the values reported for conventional synthesis and sintering processes together for zirconolite manufacturing. Thus, both the field‐assisted processing techniques were found to be highly energy efficient for the fabrication of Ce‐zirconolite ceramics, making them suitable for applications in Plutonium‐based nuclear waste disposal.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Applied Ceramic Technology
Published
2025-04-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ijac.15119
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Nuclear materials and radiation effects
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.52

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Field‐assisted processing of Ce–zirconolite ceramics for nuclear applications

Annapoorani Ketharam, Nigel Evans, Bala Vaidhyanathan, D. Pletser
1 citations
International Journal of Applied Ceramic Technology
Nuclear materials and radiation effects
0.52
article

Field‐assisted processing of Ce–zirconolite ceramics for nuclear applications

Annapoorani Ketharam, Nigel Evans, Bala Vaidhyanathan, D. Pletser
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Conventional, flash, and hybrid sintering (unique combination of conventional and microwave heating) experiments were performed on 10% Ce‐doped zirconolite samples and the results were compared. Ce–zirconolite was prepared using reactive, pressure‐less, field‐assisted hybrid processing directly from the precursor made using commercial chemical agents, viz., CaTiO 3 , ZrO 2 , TiO 2 , and CeO 2 at 1350°C/2 h. For comparison, Ce–zirconolite ceramics were produced by the conventional synthesis at 1350°C/72 h and then sintering at 1450°C/10 h based on a literature methodology. The Ce–zirconolite samples were also flash sintered for the first time at 1100°C in just 5 min with the application of an AC field to ∼98% density with a finer grain size. A novel reactive flash synthesis procedure of zirconolite precursors with subsequent flash sintering was also explored. The flash process for both synthesis/sintering needs only ∼15% of the energy (85% savings) and hybrid method requires ∼ 33% (67% savings) of the total energy, respectively, when compared to the values reported for conventional synthesis and sintering processes together for zirconolite manufacturing. Thus, both the field‐assisted processing techniques were found to be highly energy efficient for the fabrication of Ce‐zirconolite ceramics, making them suitable for applications in Plutonium‐based nuclear waste disposal.

International Journal of Applied Ceramic TechnologyVol. 22(4)
Loughborough University (GB), Research Complex at Harwell (GB), Jacobs (United Kingdom) (GB)
Nuclear Decommissioning Authority, UK Research and Innovation
Openalex Percentile: Top 40%
Nuclear materials and radiation effects
0.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.